Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40m\s+monbander\s+and\s+multibander\s+stack\s+question\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40m monbander and multibander stack question... (score: 1)
Author: "Michael W5NIG" <tower@coffeepower.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:58:54 -0600
hey gang! I'm slowly recovering from some tower issues (bad storm, tower/antenna damage etc) and am rebuilding my tower stuff. Anyway have just finished getting my 64' T-500 Trylon freestanding tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00034.html (8,649 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 40m monbander and multibander stack question... (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 22:24:31 -0500
I have a C31XR at 90 feet and a 2 el XM-240 at 75 feet. HFTA says the best height for me into EU on 40M is 70-75 feet. That's the reason for putting the 40M beam below the tribander. F-12 recommended
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00035.html (9,337 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 40m monbander and multibander stack question... (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 07:21:45 -0700
Usually people put the 40 above the tribanders because you want the added height. Which Trylon T-500 do you have? The T-500 64ft is actually 8 ft shorter than claimed because of the 1 foot overlap of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00045.html (10,285 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 40m monbander and multibander stack question... (score: 1)
Author: barockteer@aol.com
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:08:25 -0500
I originally had a 68 foot Rohn45 tower, with a KT-34XA at the top plate and a 40-2CD at the top of 10 feet of mast. This was a bear to work on, with having to remove the rotor and winch down the mas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00051.html (8,088 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu