Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40m\s+rotatable\s+dipole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40m\s+rotatable\s+dipole\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40m rotatable dipole (score: 1): Author: kb2m@comcast.net (Jeff Griffin); Date: Sun Jun 22 11:01:10 2003; I'm contemplating putting up a rotatable dipole for 40m, I sold my tri-bander with 40m add on kit, and have a 4 el SteppIR on order. I'm planning on putting the SteppIR at 65 feet and the Dipole at 7; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00345.html (7,802 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 40m rotatable dipole (score: 1): Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Sun Jun 22 13:17:22 2003; I wonder if it would be possible to gamma match the boom of the SteppIR antenna for 40 and 30 meters. Does anyone know if the parasitic elements are grounded to the boom? If so, it might be possible; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00348.html (8,664 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 40m rotatable dipole (score: 1): Author: "kb2m" <kb2m@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 06:51:30 -0400; I'm going to drop my tower this coming weekend. One of the things I plan on doing is replacing my 44' rotatable dipole with a 66' one. I looking for suggestions on what feedline to use. I'm now using; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00666.html (8,208 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 40m rotatable dipole (score: 1): Author: "kb2m" <kb2m@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 06:59:21 -0400; I'm going to drop my tower this coming weekend. One of the things I plan on doing is replacing my 44' rotatable dipole with a 66' one. I wasn't happy with the performance of the 44 footer. I looking; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00667.html (8,356 bytes)
5. RE: [TowerTalk] 40m rotatable dipole (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:11:00 -0500; My experience with ladder line has been similar to yours regarding RF. Using a full size dipole may help, but will likely not solve the problem completely. I think the biggest contributor is the balu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00671.html (9,753 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] 40M rotatable dipole (score: 1): Author: Bill Straw via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:57:58 -0700; M2 40M1L vs M2 40M1C vs Optibeam OB1-40 What's the word ? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesti; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00315.html (6,785 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M rotatable dipole (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 14:39:28 -0400; I prefer loading coils over linear loading for reducing the physical size of elements. It is very efficient. I am unable to find a price for the M2 40M1C, is it currently available? I am very happy w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00316.html (7,230 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]