Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+43\s+Ft\s+Vertical\s+on\s+80\/160\s+DX\-Pedition\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+43\s+Ft\s+Vertical\s+on\s+80\/160\s+DX\-Pedition\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 43 Ft Vertical on 80/160 DX-Pedition (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:04:46 -0600; I am aware of the issues with this antenna on 80/160. I was curious if adding a wire T to the top would improve the performance on these two bands. I am unclear what the length of the T would be or w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00305.html (7,399 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 Ft Vertical on 80/160 DX-Pedition (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:12:58 -0400; Have you read Phil Salas' article on base loading for this antenna on his website? http://www.ad5x.com/images/Articles/Match160.pdf Al AB2ZY ________________________________________ From: towertalk-b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00307.html (8,327 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 Ft Vertical on 80/160 DX-Pedition (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:45:34 -0700; Great article! thanks for sharing. 73 Jim W7RY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00338.html (9,810 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 Ft Vertical on 80/160 DX-Pedition (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:25:51 -0700; Top loading the 43' will increase its radiation resistance and thereby the efficiency. DX Eng has some top hats in their catalog. Some of the Antenna Compendiums have articles. It's an interesting qu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00401.html (10,788 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 Ft Vertical on 80/160 DX-Pedition (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 09:32:19 -0600; I spoke to one manufacturer of these and they are working on a version with 3 or 4 top guys that are a combination of wire and "rope" to effectively create top loading. They are not sure just how muc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00034.html (11,536 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 Ft Vertical on 80/160 DX-Pedition (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 13:46:44 -0700; You might wan to talk to W4EF about this sort of strategy. I think he's been using the guys as top load scheme in his desert sojourns for top band contests. Theres sort of a tradeoffs too, depending; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00047.html (13,463 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 Ft Vertical on 80/160 DX-Pedition (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:40:02 -0700; Here are a few numbers from a 20 minute modeling exercise with EZNEC 43' vertical modeled as a 1.75' diameter conductor and adding 4 top load wires at 47 deg angle to ground each 13.5' long and a per; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00072.html (15,493 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]