Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+43\s+ft\s+vertical\s+\-\s+feeding\s+and\s+balun\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+43\s+ft\s+vertical\s+\-\s+feeding\s+and\s+balun\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 43 ft vertical - feeding and balun (score: 1): Author: "Craig D. Smith" <craig@powersmith.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:56:47 -0700; I agree that a high quality general purpose remote auto-tuner suitable for KW+ levels over a "DC to Daylight" frequency range and undefined extreme impedance loads would turn out to be a quite pricy; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00598.html (8,084 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 ft vertical - feeding and balun (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:59:50 -0800; special purpose -> limited quantity -> expensive unit price (i.e. you can't spread the development cost over very many units) I'm thinking in terms of a set of L networks to get you in the This is a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00608.html (12,017 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 ft vertical - feeding and balun (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:31:22 -0500; z _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertal; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00757.html (7,503 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]