Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+4el\s+Steppir\s+vs\.\s+OB\-16\-3\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+4el\s+Steppir\s+vs\.\s+OB\-16\-3\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 4el Steppir vs. OB-16-3 (score: 1): Author: "Tadej Mezek, ve3/s51ta" <tadej.mezek@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 21:47:35 +0000; HI I know this is an old many times overchewed question (hope it will not be the same with answers :) ) but stillI've read all previous posts on this thematic but can not see the whole picture yet. M; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00025.html (8,208 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 4el Steppir vs. OB-16-3 (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:52:55 -0600; The OB-163 has 8 elements on 10m. Does not have any elements for 17 or 12. It is very large. I believe the SteppIRs do so well because there is not all that other aluminum sitting out on the antenna.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00026.html (9,070 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 4el Steppir vs. OB-16-3 (score: 1): Author: "Dan Thomspon" <kc8ab@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 19:02:15 -0400; Hi Guys, I said I wouldn't get in this debate, but here I am. I have a pair of OptiBeams, OB11-3's stacked with Array Solutions Stack Match II. When I started my search for an antenna solution, money; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00029.html (10,692 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 4el Steppir vs. OB-16-3 (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 17:24:31 -0600; A decent stack of just about anything will be better than the single antenna alone. You have another antenna to share in SO2R for one. Stacking height was not mentioned. Someday 10 and 15 will be bac; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00030.html (12,000 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 4el Steppir vs. OB-16-3 (score: 1): Author: "Tadej Mezek, ve3/s51ta" <tadej.mezek@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 23:51:22 +0000; It is true there are 8 elements on 10m meters, but they are there because of the element-band interactions not because that would provide us more gain or make a better antenna :) Separate feedlines i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00033.html (10,955 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 4el Steppir vs. OB-16-3 (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 04:15:19 +0200; Hurricanes will be no good, even for an Optibeam http://www.darc.de/distrikte/h/29/grafik/omk_sturm.htm 73 Peter You see, I'm in South Florida, hurricanes and lighting is my real issue, so I wanted t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00038.html (8,364 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] 4el Steppir vs. OB-16-3 (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 19:53:27 -0700; Great pictures! I notice that none of the single elements were damaged, though. It was the multiband elements (secondary band elements supported by a primary element) that became bent. Obviously the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00044.html (9,460 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] 4el Steppir vs. OB-16-3 (score: 1): Author: "Greg" <ab7r@cablespeed.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 20:19:21 -0700; Ouch! Glad I don't have hurricanes in WA state. But I do get LOTS of wind storms in the winter that get pretty scarey. I recently got my OB12-6 up on a 72-ft crankup tower. No really high winds to te; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00047.html (10,435 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] 4el Steppir vs. OB-16-3 (score: 1): Author: "Dan Thomspon" <kc8ab@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 00:41:55 -0400; Dave, This is exactly why I choice to use stacked OB11-3's over anything else in South Florida. Dan W4UH --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesti; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00048.html (10,547 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] 4el Steppir vs. OB-16-3 (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 12:31:50 +0200; Yes, you both did the better choice. Those Optibeams are generally very well constructed, but those like the OB18-6 would not survive one year at my qth. There is too much stress on the mechanically; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00052.html (11,311 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]