Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+6\s+meter\s+antenna\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+6\s+meter\s+antenna\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 6 meter antenna ? (score: 1): Author: k9zm@frontiernet.net (Greg Gobleman); Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 17:29:35 -0500; Has anyone had any problem with the M2 6M7JHV antenna? This has a 30'8" Boom which is only 1.5" dia. I am looking to get on 6m and want the most value for the buck. This seems to be it. However, ever; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00382.html (7,627 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 6 meter antenna ? (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:48:35 EDT; on M2 is NOT known for poor mechanical designs. They probably use Kurt's YagiStress software but I don't know for sure. 6M elements aren't real substantial so I'll bet you a nickel that it'll be just; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00383.html (8,175 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 6 meter antenna ? (score: 1): Author: dick@libelle.com (Dick Flanagan); Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 08:12:27 -0700; I considered the M2 6M7JHV, too, but opted for the slightly beefier "standard" 6M7. I believe the JHV was designed for portable use, therefore the slightly lighter duty boom. Installing the 6M7 was; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00412.html (8,405 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]