Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+6\s+meter\s+antenna\s+comparisons\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 6 meter antenna comparisons (score: 1)
Author: "Steve K7AWB" <k7awbgoog@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:19:44 -0700
I have a choice of two 6-meter yagis to put up at the 112 foot level on my tower. A Force 12 5BA ( 5 band, 15 element HF) goes at the tower top at 103 feet and above it about 9 feet will be the 6-met
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00124.html (8,172 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 6 meter antenna comparisons (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:56:41 -0700
Anyone have any opinions on which one to use? Hi Steve, Some thoughts. First, the table is the result of a MODEL, not a measurement. Second, gain is given as a single number, without reference to ban
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00125.html (8,264 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 6 meter antenna comparisons (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Banks" <larryb.w1dyj@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 19:56:33 -0400
Hi Steve, I have not used either of these yagis -- mine is a HB 7 el on a 22' boom -- so here is my opinion. (And remember, my opinion is free -- probably what it is worth.) Since forward gain is a s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00126.html (10,448 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 6 meter antenna comparisons (score: 1)
Author: Crownhaven <crownhaven@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 19:43:47 -0500
When you say weak ones, you need to tell us WHICH weak ones. Weak E, weak F2, weak tropo or weak ground wave. I find anything works on E. The band is open or it isn't. F2, what is that????? Oh, I rem
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00127.html (9,723 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] 6 meter antenna comparisons (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Schaaf" <dan-schaaf@att.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 20:56:46 -0400
I have 96 countries on 6 using a 4 element yagi at 28 ft. Only need a few islands in Caribbean and Bolivia in SA. I have worked JAs and FK8CP and New Zealand. When the prop is there, it is there. My
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00128.html (11,422 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] 6 meter antenna comparisons (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 22:39:29 -0700
I would go with the M2 6M7, about the same as the 6M7JHV I can hear the same signals as guys close to me that use the M2 6M7. The only real difference is the F/B (does not matter much on 6 meters). I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00129.html (9,747 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] 6 meter antenna comparisons (score: 1)
Author: Jay Kesterson K0GU <k0gu@verinet.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 11:41:41 -0600
The 617-6B is a very old design. If you look at the manual is is dated 9/91. It was designed before antennas were computer modeled. More boom usually means more gain *IF* you have enough elements to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00135.html (8,527 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] 6 meter antenna comparisons (score: 1)
Author: Crownhaven <crownhaven@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 12:56:45 -0500
Oversimplification on my part. I guess for most ops this might apply. I have a high and low antenna for that reason. You're right. Steve, N4JQQ On 4/14/2013 12:41 PM, Jay Kesterson K0GU wrote: The 61
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00136.html (9,490 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu