Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+67\'\s+vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+67\'\s+vertical\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] 67' vertical (score: 1): Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:20:51 -0400; I just got pricing from Bethlehem Aluminum for a nesting tubular vertical. .125" wall, 6061-T6, in diameters from 2.25 to 1.00, 12' lengths ran around $225 plus tax. That's without any clamps, cleanu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00641.html (7,554 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 67' vertical (score: 1): Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:52:03 +0000; If you are looking for a Tilt-Over mount for your Vertical, ZeroFive makes a very nice one for $100. I bought one to use with my MA-160V and it works just great. 73, Dick, W1KSZ _____________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00643.html (8,165 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 67' vertical (score: 1): Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:18:27 -0400; Good point, Arne. I was looking for first-order estimates of price, not final design. Tubing is priced by the pound. So using thinner wall would save some money. .058 wall seems a tad light to me, by; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00644.html (9,994 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 67' vertical (score: 1): Author: Greg - AB7R <ab7r@cablespeed.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:31:03 -0400; Gulf Alpha antennas also make a very nice one that is VERY hefty and a great design. I think I also paid $100 for it. I particularly like its built-in stop block so that when you are raising the ante; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00645.html (10,289 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 67' vertical (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:34:38 -0400; I am very pleased with my DXE tilt base. Works as advertised. Just make sure you pay attention to the Inside/Outside diameters of the pipe you mount it on. I had to drill it out to accommodate a 2" g; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00646.html (8,599 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 67' vertical (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:37:02 -0400; Gotta double check , but when MFJ/Hy-Gain came out with their big sticks, I believe Gulf Alpha discontinued theirs. Had a nice email exchange with the owner about the economics of it all. Nice guy. T; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00647.html (8,246 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] 67' vertical (score: 1): Author: Greg - AB7R <ab7r@cablespeed.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:47:07 -0400; Talking about matching units.... I found this tuner from a company called Consolidated Electronics out of NJ. Its pretty old but in mint condition on the inside. It's a big wx proof box containing a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00648.html (8,908 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] 67' vertical (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:10:29 -0800; The DX Engineering vertical is made out of 6063 aluminum, which is much less expensive. John KK9A I just got pricing from Bethlehem Aluminum for a nesting tubular vertical. .125" wall, 6061-T6, in di; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00650.html (8,533 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] 67' vertical (score: 1): Author: Les Kalmus <w2lk@bk-lk.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:24:23 -0400; What is the difference between 6061-T6 and 6063? Les W2LK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00651.html (9,453 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] 67' vertical (score: 1): Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:44:38 -0400; I'll check with the vendor tmw & see what the price impact of 6063 vs. 6061 is. For those who asked, off-reflector, 6063 is bendable, 6061 is stiff. See Wikipedia for the metallurgy details. N2EA ___; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00663.html (7,968 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] 67' vertical (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:12:26 -0400; Rephrased, 6063 is much softer than 6061. OTOH it is far more corrosion resistant than 6061 IIRC. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ _____________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00665.html (8,943 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]