Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+7\-16\s+DIN\s+Males\s+for\s+RG\-213\/214\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: Byron Tatum <bjtatum1@att.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:12:28 +0000 (UTC)
Hello-    Does anyone know of a source of good quality reasonably priced 7-16 DIM male connectors, of solder/clamp type, that fit the RG-213/214 type cables?    I am planning some future feedline upg
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00473.html (7,110 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:08:32 -0500
Reasonably priced is all relative.... I use TESSCO and in a pinch Pasternack.  Pasternack, in general, has an excellent selection/availability, but is considerably more expensive.  I consider Pastern
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00475.html (8,611 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 09:28:42 -0400
Pasternack manufactures most of their connectors (or contracts it), Tessco is a distributor for others (RF Industries, RFS, etc.). That said, Pasternack is overpriced and under performing IMO. They r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00476.html (8,014 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:48:47 -0400
The only ones that I have seen were $75+. Perhaps crimped ones are less. If I need a DIN jumper I use FSJ4 cable, otherwise I use N or UHF connectors on RG8 sized cables. GL John KK9A Hello- Does any
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00482.html (8,274 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: W1JCW John <W1JCW@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:56:13 +0000
I have several of these connectors for $20 each plus shipping left over from a project. These are not crimp but compression, water tight and very high quality. I've never had an issue with them. If a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00483.html (9,532 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: Peter <pc2a@pi4cc.nl>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:56:56 +0200
Byron In EU they are around 23 euro. http://awbroadcast.com/nl/product/spinner-7-16-male-connector-voor-rg-214-u/ http://nl.rs-online.com/web/p/7-16-connectors/4889346/ Peter https://www.pi4cc.nl Op
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00484.html (9,625 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:05:23 -0400
If the compression connectors you have are PPC (the only brand I'm aware of), they are for LMR400 solid center conductor cable, not for stranded center conductor RG213 style cables. If you use them o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00485.html (8,900 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: W1JCW John <W1JCW@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:09:36 +0000
No there not PPC. I'm out of town now and forget the name but that's not it. W1JCW John If the compression connectors you have are PPC (the only brand I'm aware of), they are for LMR400 solid center
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00486.html (9,226 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff DePolo" <jd0@broadsci.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:52:04 -0400
and 1-5/8" Cablewave heliax. I looked through my stock here and find Amphenol 272105 (crimp), Huber+Suhner 11_716-50-7-4/003 (clamp) and 11_716-50-7-2/003 (crimp) for RG-214 and/or RG-393, and I als
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00492.html (9,725 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 19:25:30 -0400
FSJ4 has a black polyethylene jacket. This material used in other Heliax products and it is perfectly suited for outdoor use. The jacket is thinner than LDF4 however it is still pretty though. John K
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00493.html (8,892 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff DePolo" <jd0@broadsci.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 21:34:57 -0400
I think you meant to write the jacket is tough, not that it's pretty. Anyway, the composition of the jacket isn't the issue. If you get even the slightest nick in the jacket of Superflex, due the he
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00495.html (10,209 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 09:24:56 -0400
With all this talk of water migration, I'm surprised there is no mention of Trilpgy cable. They guarantee it against water migration! They do not have a good superflexible product, however. It's even
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00497.html (11,766 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:57:17 -0700
< Hello-??? Does anyone know of a source of good quality reasonably priced?7-16 DIM male connectors, of solder/clamp type, that fit the RG-213/214 type cables???? I am planning some future feedline u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00499.html (8,783 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: David Aslin G3WGN <david@aslinvc.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:54:59 +0000
I buy mine from RFBat on EBay. After trying several Chinese suppliers RFBat come out on top for quality and speed of delivery. Most of my installation is Andrew 7/16 DIN connectors outdoors (also at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00500.html (10,218 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff DePolo" <jd0@broadsci.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:06:19 -0400
Unless they've come out with something since then, last time we looked at using or stocking Trilogy we decided not to as they only made smooth-wall aluminum shield cables. As far as smooth-wall, we
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00501.html (10,032 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:59:45 -0400
Jeff: I've used the Commscope smooth wall professionally, and it was hard to work with BUT it had significantly lower losses than the corrugated copper lines.At 2.4 GHz, we could use 7/8" smooth inst
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00502.html (12,113 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff DePolo" <jd0@broadsci.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:02:25 -0400
Even though Commscope had less loss for a given diameter cable, it was often just as cheap to upsize regular Heliax, and then I didn't have to risk having the tower crew put a kink in a line and eat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00503.html (13,964 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-16 DIN Males for RG-213/214 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 08:27:42 -0400
On 10/26/2017 1:06 PM, Jeff DePolo wrote: With all this talk of water migration, I'm surprised there is no mention of Trilpgy cable. They guarantee it against water migration! They do not have a good
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00507.html (10,562 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu