Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80\/160\s+vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80\/160\s+vertical\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80/160 vertical (score: 1): Author: <atrampler@att.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 07:46:53 -0500; OK...slightly off-topic...so perhaps reply off-list. My summer project for a small lot is an 80/160 vertical, using linear loading on 160. Think the G0BZF 40/80 vertical. Initial plan is for 60' radi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00000.html (7,041 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 80/160 vertical (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:14:23 +0200; I would not use linear loading, not high Q enough and it will make it lossy compared to good base loading. If I had a 60ft radiator I would put on top loading to get it resonant on lets say 2.6 MHz.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00001.html (8,867 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 80/160 vertical (score: 1): Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:58:41 -0400; I use a 39 feet long piece of wire strung from a tree, with two 29 feet capacitance loading at the top extended outwards. It hangs from a tree, and the legs of each "t" portion is out 29 feet from th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00003.html (9,136 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]