Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80\s+4\-square\s+inside\s+a\s+160\s+4\-square\?\s+Pros\s+and\s+Consplease\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 4-square inside a 160 4-square? Pros and Consplease! (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 07:31:56 -0400
antennas at the same time 4-squares would be using make any Bob, What you are doing is the same thing as co-locating two BC stations, which is something I have done as a consultant. Besides the high
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00212.html (10,559 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 4-square inside a 160 4-square? Pros and Consplease! (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:35:43 -0400
that it. This is like grounded. When you have limited space, you live with what you can reasonably do. I think grounding it would be OK. I'd sure try it and see. Multiple 80m traps is just too compl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00240.html (8,944 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 4-square inside a 160 4-square? Pros and Consplease! (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 06:20:31 -0400
Hi Guys, I want to thank W8JI, N6RK, W5VU and Jim Lux (callsign?) for their responses. Apparently this can be done but due to technical issues, is rather complex. Having the need to use 2 antennas on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00271.html (10,787 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 4-square inside a 160 4-square? Pros and Consplease! (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
When I built my first 7 hex array, I measured the impedances and compared them with EZNEC. They were considerably different. Fortunately, the phasing network has one adjustable coil and one adjustabl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00282.html (10,790 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu