Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80\s+Meter\s+Self\s+Supporting\s+Vertical\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80\s+Meter\s+Self\s+Supporting\s+Vertical\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80 Meter Self Supporting Vertical....... (score: 1): Author: ron.stordahl@digikey.com (Ron Stordahl); Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 23:22:47 -0600; I would like to put up a full size 80 meters vertical without guys. I will have space for a buried radial system of as many 1/4 wave radials as is needed for good performance. Would prefer an insulat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00147.html (8,594 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 80 Meter Self Supporting Vertical....... (score: 1): Author: k4sqr@juno.com (k4sqr@juno.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 06:02:43 -0500; Ron; First, compare your county's wind load rating zone, ie 70 MPH etc.. Comtek 4-Square users have modified Hy-Gain Hy-Towers (24') by stripping all stubs off and tapering the aluminum "stinger" so; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00149.html (10,464 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 80 Meter Self Supporting Vertical....... (score: 1): Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 07:36:41 EST; In a message dated 1/5/01 9:22:28 PM Pacific Standard Time, ron.stordahl@digikey.com writes: << I would like to put up a full size 80 meters vertical without guys. I will have space for a buried radi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00151.html (11,443 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 80 Meter Self Supporting Vertical....... (score: 1): Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass); Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 07:41:38 -0500; Self-supporting aluminum tower (Heights or similar) self-supports easily at these required lengths. What's the question? Jeff Maass jmaass@columbus.rr.com Located near Columbus Ohio USPSA # L-1192 N; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00152.html (9,736 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] 80 Meter Self Supporting Vertical....... (score: 1): Author: wx0b@arraysolutions.com (Jay Terleski); Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 07:56:25 -0600; For a complete system that can work 3 bands with the tuner, and is very attractive, have a look at the Titanex 80HD Free standing tower. It includes the insulated base and Winch to put it up or down.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00155.html (8,140 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] 80 Meter Self Supporting Vertical....... (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 12:13:02 -0500; Hi Ken, You made this suggestion before with a dipole, and when I looked at it on a Smith Chart it wouldn't work at all. With the dipole (and ladder line) the SWR at the upper band edge was very poor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00157.html (11,391 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] 80 Meter Self Supporting Vertical....... (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:05:41 -0600; A truly self supporting 80M vertical is a challenge. A set of LIGHT guys, close in, greatly simplifies the design. For relatively short masts with very small loads, there is no reason the guys can't; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00259.html (8,515 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] 80 Meter Self Supporting Vertical....... (score: 1): Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com); Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 04:34:08 EST; << A truly self supporting 80M vertical is a challenge. A set of LIGHT guys, close in, greatly simplifies the design. For relatively short masts with very small loads, there is no reason the guys can; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00299.html (9,588 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]