Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80\s+Meter\s+yagi\s+\-\s+Height\s+recommendation\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80 Meter yagi - Height recommendation (score: 1)
Author: "M. Kent Miller" <K4MK@triad.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 23:12:52 -0500
Keith, My 2 element 80 meter yagi is 130 feet up. It works very well at distances over 2500 miles, but not as effectively as my wire antennas for " local " ( inside USA ) use. My guess is that if it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00112.html (7,744 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 Meter yagi - Height recommendation (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 20:26:21 -0800 (PST)
I have A/B'ed 80 meter dipoles at 115 feet high vs 60 feet high. The high one is ~10 dB better on DX and the low one is ~10 dB better on locals (up to 150 miles or so). A really low one (at 30 ft) wa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00113.html (8,374 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 Meter yagi - Height recommendation (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:37:10 -0600
Rick, Thanks to you and many others for the feedback. I am going with 140 feet. This should be a good compromise between domestic and DX operation. I also have an 80M vertical that works quite well b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00114.html (8,264 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 Meter yagi - Height recommendation (score: 1)
Author: "noddie" <noddie@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:49:18 -0800
Rick, I would go as high as you can with beam and put an inverted V up for local. I find the IV works great for me for the US continent and Hawaii. Mike Rick, Thanks to you and many others for the fe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00115.html (8,876 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu