Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80\s+meter\s+antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80\s+meter\s+antenna\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@wildblue.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:07:27 -0400; "I'll go along with Mark, and add a warning. If you hang an 80M Inverted Veee dipole or sloper from the tower it'll screw up the gamma feed you have for sure. " Two things: I make coax assemblies eve; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00832.html (8,225 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:47:45 -0400; experience a meter sloping dipole. difference in I mentioned Inverted Vee dipole or a sloper in reference to suggestions an Inverted Vee dipole or 1/4 wave sloper be hung from the tower. The problem; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00835.html (8,283 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:22:42 -0700; Hi All Right now I have an 80 meter inverted 'V' up about 80 feet or so in a tree. It seems to work OK. The problem is, the way it is set up, the 2 ends of the antenna are only about 30 feet apart, k; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00180.html (7,871 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:46:07 -0600; Tom, You probably don't have a way to move the ends apart or you would have. No modeling here either but I bet the pattern is not great with the legs so close together. I have no clue what would happ; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00181.html (8,702 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:52:41 -0700; Since you have 80 feet of height to work with, I would string up a quarter wave vertical. You only need 70 feet for a quarter wave on 80. Then either use (4) elevated radials. You cant beat a vertica; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00182.html (8,823 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:55:28 -0700; I meant to say you can use either 2 or 4 radials if they are elevated. Bob K6UJ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00183.html (8,885 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:07:59 -0400; Hi Tom - I would be afraid that with the ends that close together on 80 that, at least up near the feed point, it would start looking too much like an unterminated feedline, or at best be directional; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00185.html (9,929 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:07:58 -0600; Tom, I am not an antenna expert, but on 160M there seems to be quite a few guys using Inverted Ls. I will say that 80 ft is pretty low for any type of dipole on 80 meters (at least for a low angle of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00186.html (10,168 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:35:52 -0700; I'll strongly agree with this. When I lived on a city lot in Chicago I had an 80M diipole at about 40 ft that I fed with parallel wire line. I used it on both 80 and 160M by tying both sides of the f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00187.html (9,266 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Lewis" <clewis@knology.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:26:33 -0500; Tom, Setting it up as a half-wave inverted-L and feeding at the center should work well. I am very happy with mine. If you only plan to use it on 80/75M, you can feed it with coax, but be sure to dec; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00193.html (10,352 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:34:36 -0400; Tom: I'll provide a contrary opinion. If you can put up a delta loop, fed 1/4 wave down from the apex you might be surprised at how it might work, and you can avoid radials if they are not in the car; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00194.html (8,063 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:52:34 -0400; A delta loop is af fine antenna but you probably don't have room to lay out the base wire and it might be bidirectional, but have some gain. I'll stick with the end loaded vertical. Effecient. Balanc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00198.html (9,112 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:05:29 -0700; Thanks for all the suggestions. Some really good food for thought. The tree is right on the edge of about a 400 foot hill that slopes off right from the base of the tree to all the good directions -; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00199.html (9,439 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:53:54 -0400; Alternatively, if you do not have space for radials, you can reduce your ground losses by elevating the center of current above ground. You can do this by building a double L antenna: http://www.yccc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00209.html (8,845 bytes)
15. [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: Spencer <k5gak@powerc.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:34:30 -0600; Try this http://www.davekalahar.com/Misc_Files/ARRL%200802%2080%20Meter%20Loop.pdf _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing li; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00336.html (6,844 bytes)
16. [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: Tom Martin <tmartin@chartermi.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:24:01 -0500; Dick, Why not suspend two 80 meter quad elements between the two towers? You can add a relay on one loop( director) and switch in a pair of lines to equal a reflector. Two directions. I think that a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-09/msg00265.html (12,836 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]