Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80\s+meter\s+wire\s+vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80\s+meter\s+wire\s+vertical\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80 meter wire vertical (score: 1): Author: Bill via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:28:08 -0400; All this talk about 80 meter verticals got me thinking. For a wire vertical, suppose instead of a single wire, we replaced it with two wires separated by about three or four inches, connected at the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00131.html (7,632 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter wire vertical (score: 1): Author: Fred Keen via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:33:15 +0000 (UTC); Why not a full "cage" as was installed at W1AW? There they used 4 wires separated with rods. Full article was in QST. Reported good bandwidth. FredKC5YN. For a wire vertical, suppose instead of a sin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00133.html (8,464 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter wire vertical (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:34:38 -0700; All this talk about 80 meter verticals got me thinking. For a wire vertical, suppose instead of a single wire, we replaced it with two wires separated by about three or four inches, connected at the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00134.html (8,325 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter wire vertical (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:00:12 -0700; For a wire vertical, suppose instead of a single wire, we replaced it with two wires separated by about three or four inches, connected at the bottom and top. Several years ago, I did that with the v; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00135.html (10,383 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter wire vertical (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:04:56 -0700; For a wire vertical, suppose instead of a single wire, we replaced it with two wires separated by about three or four inches, connected at the bottom and top. Several years ago, I did that with the v; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00138.html (10,298 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter wire vertical (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:37:42 -0700; If you look back at pictures of the early stations, a lot of them had a horizontal wire with 4 or 5 wires in a flat-top configuration. Most of them were between a couple of supports and fed with a si; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00139.html (9,095 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter wire vertical (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:49:02 -0700; That's a very common configuration - it's basically a capacitively loaded short vertical. Back then, they were working at pretty low frequencies - hundreds of meters wavelength (200m and shorter is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00141.html (8,924 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]