Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80M\s+dipole\s+trapped\s+for\s+30M\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80M\s+dipole\s+trapped\s+for\s+30M\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80M dipole trapped for 30M (score: 1): Author: paul.baldock@checksum.com (Paul Baldock); Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 19:51:49 -0700; I'd like to put up an 80M dipole trapped for 30M. Anybody have any design info? Paul Paul Baldock, CheckSum Inc., PO Box 3279, Arlington, WA 98223. Phone (360) 435 5510 Fax (360) 435 5535 EMAIL paul.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00252.html (7,926 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 80M dipole trapped for 30M (score: 1): Author: b4e@earthlink.net (DavidC); Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 22:56:38 -0400; Have you tried: http://funnelweb.utcc.utk.edu/~cebik/radio.html That and a whole lot more is likely to be found there ..... 73, DavidC K1YP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00253.html (7,923 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 80M dipole trapped for 30M (score: 1): Author: realex@flash.net (bob alexander); Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 07:17:52 -0500; -- Hi Paul, An 80 meter dipole will work quite well on 30 meters, all you need is a tuner. No traps needed. However, if you do not have a tuner... Cut your 30 meter dipole to length per the usual for; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00257.html (8,839 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 80M dipole trapped for 30M (score: 1): Author: albraun@socket.net (Alan Braun); Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 12:57:12 -0000; You don't need to trap an 80 mtr dipole for 30 mtrs. 30 is an odd harmonic of 80 and will the antenna will resonate there as is, no problemo. I used an 80 mtr 1/4 wave sloper on 30 for years & it did; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00258.html (9,044 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] 80M dipole trapped for 30M (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com (TexasRF@aol.com); Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 09:10:23 EDT; The 80 meter dipole works surprisingly well on 17 and 12 meters as well, on the 5th and 7th harmonics. 73 de k5gw -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@con; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00259.html (7,583 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] 80M dipole trapped for 30M (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 11:35:03 -0600; As has been already stated, an 80M dipole makes a GREAT WARC Band Antenna if it is reasonably flat (horizontal). It is nearly 3/2 wavelengths (WL) on 30M, almost exactly 5/2 WL on 17M and almost exac; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00263.html (10,200 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] 80M dipole trapped for 30M (score: 1): Author: b4e@earthlink.net (DavidC); Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 12:52:20 -0400; At what height please do you have your dipole(s)? I imagine that will make a significant difference in performance. Thanks! & 73, DavidC K1YP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.htm; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00264.html (8,398 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] 80M dipole trapped for 30M (score: 1): Author: basalop@gte.net (Jim Berry); Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 12:00:00 -0700; I once had an 80 meter dipole and wanted to operate on 30 meters also. What I did was hang a 30 meter dipole of the same center feeder of the 80 meter one. You might have to jockey things around to g; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00283.html (8,762 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]