Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80M\s+dipoles\/height\s+gain\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80M\s+dipoles\/height\s+gain\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80M dipoles/height gain (score: 1): Author: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb); Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:24:04 +0000; Here are some EZNEC calcs of an 80 meter dipole at heights from 60' to 160' Clearly guys who get even dipoles high win. height max gain/angle half power angles 20deg gain 60' 6.52dbi/89deg 30deg 1.5d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00412.html (11,366 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 80M dipoles/height gain (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:34:16 -0400; Modelling prompted me to install a 318 ft tower, and that probably was one of the worse investments I ever made. But hey, if you don't try one you never know. Don't sell a vertical short without try; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00415.html (8,852 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 80M dipoles/height gain (score: 1): Author: franknorton@home.com (Frank Norton); Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:16:07 -0400; It is important to note Brians table of gain figures and the conclusions reached: I would not argue with any of his points except minor issues about location and the reality of cost per S unit. The c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00417.html (12,370 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 80M dipoles/height gain (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:22:43 -0600; N4KG comments inserted below. have poor range marsh, What TRANSMITTING and RECEIVING antennas were assumed for these propagation models? N4KG 160M and 80M just don't play the same, at least not in AL; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00424.html (11,711 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] 80M dipoles/height gain (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 20:42:29 -0400; Hi Tom, Hi Tom, How far are you verticals from other vertical metallic structures, and have you checked the patterns? How good are your ground and feed systems? How traditional are your verticals? 73; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00435.html (7,905 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] 80M dipoles/height gain (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 20:28:02 -0600; The elevated GP has been 6 to 10 dB stronger on RX and TX into OH / SM around 0500Z. It 'plays' well into HL / JA / UA0 and the Pacific. The Elevated GP is 75 ft North of my 55 ft tower with 5L10's a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00441.html (9,516 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] 80M dipoles/height gain (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:34:18 -1000; This series of information has been one of the great benefits of this reflector. Praise to those who are participating. Just wish I had the QTH to allow some of this info to become applied, hi. Have; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00445.html (8,100 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] 80M dipoles/height gain (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 09:45:07 -0400; Hi Tom, Like most cases, the installation is too complex to tell what is causing what. Even without any measurements, we know that is a situation where more than one "antenna" radiates significantly; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00453.html (8,745 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]