Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80M\s+loading\s+coil\s+\-\s+open\s+coil\s+or\s+toroid\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80M\s+loading\s+coil\s+\-\s+open\s+coil\s+or\s+toroid\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80M loading coil - open coil or toroid? (score: 1): Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 15:43:01 -0500; For my 80M 4-sq with a Comtek box I use a 3.6 uh coil to resonate the shortened (41') radials (minimum power in a dummy load at 3.76MHZ. In addition I add a 4.1uh coil to resonate the radials at 3.53; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00007.html (7,612 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 80M loading coil - open coil or toroid? (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 07:44:55 -0800; Is there a reason I should use something like a toroid coils instead of open coils, other than the weather making the coil forms brittle after several years? I found some cores in my junk box but not; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00011.html (9,023 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]