Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80m\s+Inverted\s+L\s+or\s+40m\s+vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80m\s+Inverted\s+L\s+or\s+40m\s+vertical\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80m Inverted L or 40m vertical (score: 1): Author: Daniel Hileman <n9wx@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:42:38 +0000; Well...I have room for ONE more antenna...right now I have a Inverted V for 75M...and a homebrew 20m vertical. I was wanting something that would perform well for 80/40m DX. Thought about one of thos; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00210.html (7,721 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m Inverted L or 40m vertical (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:30:05 -0800; What kind of trees? What kind of spacing(s) between supports? An inverted L as you describe should work very well on 80M, but I would try to keep the vertical portion at a distance from the trees. Th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00215.html (8,088 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m Inverted L or 40m vertical (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:35:45 -0800; Another thought -- consider a 40M dipole fed with 100 ohm twinlead that you can reconfigure as a tee for 80M. To reconfigure it, simply tie both sides of the feedline together and connect them to the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00216.html (7,516 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m Inverted L or 40m vertical (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Lewis" <clewis@knology.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:04:57 -0600; Chuck, N4NM _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00219.html (8,710 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]