Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80m\s+rotary\s+dipole\s+for\s+160M\s+RX\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80m\s+rotary\s+dipole\s+for\s+160M\s+RX\s+\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80m rotary dipole for 160M RX ? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:32:00 -0800; Has anybody tried using a 80m rotary dipole as a 160M RX ant ? Im thinking it may well be quieter than any dedicated RX ant I could come up with....on a city lot. There is no way I can get adequate s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-01/msg00254.html (7,063 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m rotary dipole for 160M RX ? (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:59:13 -0800; On 1/17/17 9:32 AM, Jim Thomson wrote: Has anybody tried using a 80m rotary dipole as a 160M RX ant ? Im thinking it may well be quieter than any dedicated RX ant I could come up with....on a city lo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-01/msg00255.html (8,897 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m rotary dipole for 160M RX ? (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:47:37 -0800; I am currently experimenting with a full size (70 foot long) 40 meter dipole pair at 106 feet high for both 80 and 160 meter receiving. I previously successfully operated the dipoles as a "driven" ar; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-01/msg00257.html (9,777 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m rotary dipole for 160M RX ? (score: 1): Author: "Hardy Landskov" <n7rt@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:09:34 -0500; I had a low horizontal 160 dipole stretched across my property and it was no good. Robin WA6??? suggested it because they had one in Burma and it was a good RX antenna. But YMMV... 73 N7RT Has anybod; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-01/msg00258.html (8,478 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m rotary dipole for 160M RX ? (score: 1): Author: VE6WZ Steve <ve6wz@shaw.ca>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:29:42 -0700 (MST); Yes Jim.... For the last 5 years I have used my 80m Yagi elements for a phased rx array on 160m. It has been my main 160m rx antenna most of the time. I use vacuum relays at each element to switch in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-01/msg00259.html (9,330 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m rotary dipole for 160M RX ? (score: 1): Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:36:14 -0500; Yes - I used a F12 Magnum in AZ at 136' and now here in SC at 144'.... it doesn't play particularly well on 160 RX. The Hi-Z is much better. That stated occasionally I'll hear DX quite nicely on it .; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-01/msg00261.html (8,839 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]