Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80m\s+vertical\:\s+reality\s+check\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80m\s+vertical\:\s+reality\s+check\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80m vertical: reality check (score: 1): Author: "Yo3ctk" <yo3ctk@alltrom.ro>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:40:18 +0300; I am trying to design an 80m lambda/4 vertical for a 4-square. My plan is to use 6 ft sections of AL tubing, 0.058" wall, as advertised on Texas Tower website: http://www.texastowers.com/aluminum.htm; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00724.html (7,363 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m vertical: reality check (score: 1): Author: "Adrian Rees" <rees.a@btconnect.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:46:01 +0100; Instead of AL Tubing, why not try this: http://www.spiderbeam.net/sb/product_info.php?info=p71_Spiderbeam%2018m%20fiberglass%20pole.html I reckon it would be easier than AL Tubing etc. 73 Adrian MW1L; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00725.html (8,491 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m vertical: reality check (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:06:06 -0400; I have 2 full-size 80m verticals using tubing from Texas Towers. The current versions have been up for 1.5 years with no problems. But, they are the third version. The first 2 attempts didn't go so w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00742.html (10,533 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m vertical: reality check (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:48:06 -0400; A couple of thoughts on these verticals: Is there a specific reason for going with the short sections of tubing? You can purchase aviation grade Aluminum tubing in lengths up to around the 20 to 24 f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00745.html (14,813 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m vertical: reality check (score: 1): Author: "Yo3ctk" <yo3ctk@alltrom.ro>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:02:56 +0200; What a valuable resource this reflector is! Thank you all for the comments to my original post. Some brief explanations: - I cannot consider using sections longer than 6ft because they have to be tra; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00796.html (13,088 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m vertical: reality check (score: 1): Author: "Alex Malyava" <alex.k2bb@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 16:13:32 -0500; Is there any way to _calculate_ proper number and heigth of guying for such "Texas Tower" telescope? I am going to build a 55' tall field-day style vertical for 160-80-40m. The vertical gonna consist; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00896.html (11,305 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]