Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+9913\s+coax\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+9913\s+coax\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 9913 coax (score: 1): Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@wildblue.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:04:00 -0400; It bothers me that 9913 coax gets a bum rap in the amateur radio field. I personally have used a 130' run for over 15 years to feed one tower and to date, there is no moisture in the cable. The key t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00748.html (7,746 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 9913 coax (score: 1): Author: Dave NØRQ <n0rq-lists@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:12:38 -0500; There is a worthwhile "coax loss calculator" that I think is worth a bookmark... see http://www.ocarc.ca/coax.htm It includes BuryFlex, the Time LMR-series, 9913, Heliax, and a number of others. Than; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00749.html (7,339 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 9913 coax (score: 1): Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:23:54 -0700; I would agree, I always used it in the UK for 15 years with no problem and it does not get much wetter than the UK. You just have to take the time to make good waterproof connections and check it eve; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00750.html (8,459 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 9913 coax (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:56:20 +0100; Like K6BR, I've been around the block with airspaced cables like 9913 in a wet climate, with 1500W at 432MHz to punish any mistakes. If the end of an airspaced cable like 9913 is not completely seale; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00752.html (9,631 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 9913 coax (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:03:24 -0400; I knew some one would comes to 9913's defense, but "to me" there is no such thing as proper water proofing for it. Certainly there are going to be more happy users than dissatisfied, but to me it on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00753.html (11,336 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 9913 coax (score: 1): Author: Larry Kirkland <lkirkland@sc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:22:37 -0400; I'm trying some Commscope #3227 that was recommended to me as as substitute for LMR-400. It's somewhat stiff, but is light and standard connectors are easy to install. This stuff is inexpensive (comp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00754.html (7,323 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] 9913 coax (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:24:34 -0700; A couple of years ago, there was a warehouse on the East Coast full of this stuff that was purchased by a cell wireless company who then proceeded to go belly up before they could use it. It got sold; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00757.html (8,419 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] 9913 coax (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:36:04 -0400; I use standard PL259s on LMR-400 with no problem. The "Extra Flex" with the stranded inner connector does require a bit of trimming. (Remove two opposing strands) When I purchased two spools of LMR; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00758.html (9,087 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]