Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+A\s+Sad\s+Precedent\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+A\s+Sad\s+Precedent\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: agray@voicenet.com (Alan D. Gray); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 22:35:15 -0500; Yada, Yada, Yada.. The tower company, with the help of the kind folks in local gov't, thought they could stick it to a property owner for their own selfish gain. Now they gotta pay...tis really all t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00486.html (10,637 bytes)
22. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: ronc@sonic.net (Ron Castro); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 19:56:02 -0800; What's the difference between a dead skunk in the middle of the road and a dead lawyer in the middle of the road? There's skid marks in front of the skunk! Ron N6AHA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contest; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00487.html (8,271 bytes)
23. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL@aol.com); Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 00:42:48 EST; I dont think we can point our fingers at "greedy attorneys" as they reflect your greedy neighbors and friends. As far as our laws and courts are conecerned, it may not be a perfect system but it beat; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00489.html (8,720 bytes)
24. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: wa3gin@erols.com (Dave Jordan); Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 01:25:15 -0500; Folks should send this story to all the TOWER BROKERS in the USA so they can get behind the GTE appeal... -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00490.html (8,394 bytes)
25. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: k3nd@yahoo.com (GALE STEWARD); Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 05:20:49 -0800 (PST); Alan, I'm sure you are far more knowledgeable than I regarding legal matters. I sure hope you're right! The scary part is that most of the issues involving the cellsite case could be applied to my (a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00494.html (12,480 bytes)
26. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (thompson@mindspring.com); Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 10:53:46 -0500; ordered You can bet the cellular community will appeal or take the case to federal court. Especially since the city approved the site through zoning. This would mean the end of cellular towers in th; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00497.html (9,441 bytes)
27. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: tao@skypoint.com (Tod); Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 09:20:35 -0700; I just walked away from 3.5 acres in a rural part of Idaho where there were CC&R's regarding towers. I pointed out that there were no concerns about chickens, cows and horses running around in front; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00498.html (11,305 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]