Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+A3\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] A3 (score: 1)
Author: K8fu@aol.com
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:57:37 EST
Gentlemen and antenna aficionados regardless of gender.... I hv a used A3 that I've had up and down the twr at least 10 times and I'm going bonkers. 1. I hv new 15m traps on the driven element. 2. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00768.html (7,154 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] A3 (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:13:07 -0500
1:3:1. Froggy OM, What on earth is a 1:3:1 SWR?? Do you mean 1.3:1? I'm confused. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wirele
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00773.html (7,601 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] A3 (score: 1)
Author: "ChetMoore" <ChetMoore@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:25:20 -0500
Ok I'll bite, whats wrong with 1:3:1?? This "problem" exist across the whole 20M band?? Could you expand a bit as to why this is a problem? Don't "wait up" for a call from Cushcraft, I reallly would
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00774.html (9,377 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] A3 (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:12:42 -0000
First you need to sober up and read the meter... is it 1.3:1?? That would be good. Or is it 1:3? If so, you are standing on your head, please turn the meter over and read again. Or is it 3:1?? And i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00776.html (8,025 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] A3 (score: 1)
Author: k2qmf@juno.com
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:14:10 -0500
What's wrong with 1:3 to 1 ???????? K2QMF _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Cal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00780.html (8,611 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] A3 (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 05:15:20 +0000
That doesn't make sense. At what frequencies. If you're flat across the whole band, you've got a bad problem. And the loss from a 1.3:1 SWR is not enough to even worry about. Good man! 73 Ed ________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00785.html (8,003 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu