I have no dog in this hunt, and I have not read the comments that K7LXC apparently posted regarding AN Wireless towers. However, I have been an attorney for 44 years and I happen to own two AN Wirele
I have to agree with everything in this post. Lawsuit threats are nothing to get all bent about, and they reflect far more on some individual's state of mind than they do on the product involved ...
73, Jerry _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 04:31:20 -0400
Not referring to the AN tower, but the remarks as to becoming a sue happy society which I believe that to be true. Frivolous lawsuits abound and there are many examples of people doing idiotic things
Author: Kevin Stover <kevin.stover@mediacombb.net>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 17:42:47 -0500
Dan did buy the company back in November of last year. There was a post by him on QRZ.com announcing the change. I will say this: First, the AN towers are an extraordinarily good product. Armageddon
Second, AN Wireless has every right to protest any comments that it thinks are defamatory, to include the right to sue. You have that right. I have that right. They have that right. Once again, I hav
My curiosity got the better of me, so I looked back in the Towertalk archives to try to find out what this is all about. The only thing I could find was one post where Steve complained about the huge
I don't know how big AN Wireless is, but in cases like these it's often a large company with deep pockets that is able to afford a well-staffed legal department which they use to intimidate people wh
No. He said " AN Wireless has every right to protest any comments that it thinks are defamatory, to include the right to sue. " "In my opinion Jim's Wireless towers are a poor value for the money" i
One man's opinion is another man's defamation. I suppose it's ultimately up to the courts to decide (hopefully it won't get that far). IANAL, but what Steve said regarding AN Wireless towers doesn't
I looked at replacing my 45+ year old crank up with an 80 or 90 foot AN tower several years ago before the IRS took the funding. I do remember the base was about 12 yards of concrete. This is needed
One man's opinion is another man's defamation. I suppose it's ultimately up to the courts to decide (hopefully it won't get that far). IANAL, but what Steve said regarding AN Wireless towers doesn't
The tower installation Steve was referring to in the first post indeed required >25 cubic yards of concrete. I know because it's my tower that he's referring to. The PE who did the calculations for
The tower installation Steve was referring to in the first post indeed required >25 cubic yards of concrete. I know because it's my tower that he's referring to. The PE who did the calculations for m
My soil is hard-packed adobe clay, not loamy or sandy soil. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contestin
My soil is hard-packed adobe clay, not loamy or sandy soil. more concrete. I have hard clay here too. hole is 7 x 7 x 9 deep. had to do the last tiny bit by hand..since the small back hoe on tank tre
If those were the offending posts, then I'd say Dan is being a really big crybaby. I'm not a lawyer, but I can't imagine how the "fair comment" defence could possibly fail. One of the differences bet