Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ATR\-20\s+vs\s+AT1KP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ATR\-20\s+vs\s+AT1KP\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] ATR-20 vs AT1KP (score: 1): Author: "W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 19:06:49 -0500; I have decided get a Transmatch (Antenna Tuner) and have narrowed the choice between the Ameritron ATR-20 and the Palstar AT1KP. I don't need a Legal Limit tuner because I do not have a Legal Limit a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00134.html (6,954 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] ATR-20 vs AT1KP (score: 1): Author: "David J Windisch" <davidjw@cinci.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 20:57:41 -0400; Pony up for a full-power balanced version. You can belt knobs together to get a differential option. One fine day, you may find life too short for QRP and toroidal baluns ;o) 73 Dave N3HE ___________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00135.html (8,194 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] ATR-20 vs AT1KP (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 00:58:41 -0400; Hmmm... let's see... 17 happy customers with a 5.0 rating... or 7 happy customers with a 4.6 rating... Hmmmmm Let's see... a company with a stellar reputation, vs a company with a history of quality; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00142.html (7,993 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] ATR-20 vs AT1KP (score: 1): Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>; Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 01:07:44 -0500; This is a 'no-brainor'.... Who is Ameritron's parent company..... I have never heard a bad report, on the air, about any Palstar product. The only tuner I've ever heard more praise for is the 'ole-re; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00144.html (9,227 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] ATR-20 vs AT1KP (score: 1): Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 01:16:29 -0400; "This is a 'no-brainor'.... Who is Ameritron's parent company..... I have never heard a bad report, on the air, about any Palstar product. The only tuner I've ever heard more praise for is the 'ole-r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00145.html (8,055 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] ATR-20 vs AT1KP (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 02:00:52 -0400; I don't know the companies, but 4 tenths of a point would not necessarily indicate a quality problem. One problem customer could do the same. 73 Roger (K8RI) _________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00146.html (8,951 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] ATR-20 vs AT1KP (score: 1): Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>; Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 02:07:26 -0500; RE: "In the interest of perspective," Here are just a couple of links. I could fill up an entire page with these kinds of links: http://forums.qrz.com/archive/index.php/t-90206.html http://lists.cont; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00147.html (9,470 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] ATR-20 vs AT1KP (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 14:30:00 -0400; Right, from a purely statistical point of view, but I was really pointing to the fact there are so many more reviews for the one than the other, AND they were (albeit just lightly) more favorable. 17; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00162.html (8,273 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]