Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+AV\-640\s+$was\s+Gap\s+Challenger\s+ComparisonTesting\s+Studies$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+AV\-640\s+$was\s+Gap\s+Challenger\s+ComparisonTesting\s+Studies$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] AV-640 (was Gap Challenger ComparisonTesting Studies) (score: 1): Author: "Dan Schaaf" <dan-schaaf@att.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:08:09 -0400; I didn't get it to work on 160. !!! But, if you notice, the frequency on the 17 meter band is 10 times the frequency on 160 meters. A tuner can load it. but it is not wise to do so. Once I realized t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00800.html (22,512 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] AV-640 (was Gap Challenger ComparisonTesting Studies) (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:39:01 -0400; The AV640 is electronically simple, although a bit complex mechanically (lots of parts) Each band is independent of the others and there is no interaction between bands when setting the resonant freq; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00803.html (26,341 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]