Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+About\s+to\s+pull\s+the\s+trigger\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+About\s+to\s+pull\s+the\s+trigger\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] About to pull the trigger (score: 1): Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:35:08 -0800 (PST); All, After many long months of thinking, reading, and exchanging countless emails with other hams, I am about to pull the trigger and order tons of gear. Literally. Naturally, I am a bit nervous, so; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00501.html (7,514 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] About to pull the trigger (score: 1): Author: "Rudy Bakalov" <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:42:36 +0000; No, no WARC, contesting bands only, mostly CW and RTTY. Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry If you are NOT interested in the WARC bands at all, then this will be a killer one tower, 3-anten; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00502.html (9,814 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] About to pull the trigger (score: 1): Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:20:02 -0000; -- Sounds great to me, but it would be a shame to break up the stack just to feed the second radio on 10, 15, and 20. Another tribander in there would be great for the second radio, something like a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00505.html (9,307 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] About to pull the trigger (score: 1): Author: Tom McDermott <tom.mcdermott4@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:43:43 -0800 (PST); Built almost this same setup in 1984 using Rohn 45 (different rotators). Comments: 2. I don't know if there have been mechanical improvements in the 4M40 since 1984. Referencing the older design: th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00507.html (10,848 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] About to pull the trigger (score: 1): Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:46:46 -0500 (EST); If you search the Towertalk archives, you'll find some hams (e.g., K7SV) had problems with stacking the KT36XA and the 40M4LLDD. I'm not sure that the smaller Prosistel is a good choice for turning t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00508.html (13,046 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]