Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Adding\s+160\s+to\s+an\s+80M\s+dipole\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Adding 160 to an 80M dipole? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Banks" <larryb.w1dyj@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:16:53 -0500
Hi all, The ARRL 160 contest got me interested in 160. I would like to add loading coils and additional wire to my 80M dipole at my QTH in Maine to see how that might fly. (It would make it an 80/160
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00210.html (7,310 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Adding 160 to an 80M dipole? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:15:09 -0800
Larry, Horizontal antennas are not very effective on 160M because it's usually not practical to get them high enough to not be a cloud-warmer. I had an 160/80 dipole up about 120 ft between a couple
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00218.html (8,155 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Adding 160 to an 80M dipole? (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Swadener via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:06:57 +0000 (UTC)
Jim, I suggested that but Larry sez he can't do that. For others, my 80m cage inverted vee (sans feedpoint choke) functions on 160m as a vertical w/ top-hat on 160m. The apex is at 70' AGL w/ about 8
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00228.html (10,126 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Adding 160 to an 80M dipole? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:25:51 -0800
Hi Bryan, Your concept is excellent, and a much more elegant version of what I did in Chicago. In essence, it's a Tee vertical. 73, Jim K9YC On Tue,12/16/2014 9:06 PM, Bryan Swadener via TowerTalk wr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00230.html (10,692 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Adding 160 to an 80M dipole? (score: 1)
Author: "K0DAN" <k0dan@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:10:11 -0600
If you have an 80M dipole, you can make it a nifty multiband antenna by making it a single wire feed "T" antenna (see attached dwg). Much info on Google, but attached is a suggestion from the Drake M
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00237.html (10,623 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Adding 160 to an 80M dipole? (score: 1)
Author: RLVZ--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:46:34 -0500
For 160-m. I agree with John's statement below, unless the vertical is real short and base loaded in which case I'd prefer a low Dipole or Inverted Vee on if there's no better option such as a top lo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00248.html (9,276 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Adding 160 to an 80M dipole? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 14:19:11 -0500
This is the point exactly ... the radiation resistance of a "short" vertical (less than 50' or so on 160) combined with the relatively high losses in a base loading coil and less than optimum ground
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00250.html (10,570 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Adding 160 to an 80M dipole? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:22:23 -0800
Did you have a good radial or counterpoise system on it? That's needed to minimize loss in the soil near the base of the antenna. Salt water helps (a lot) in the far field, but the soil under the ant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00251.html (9,444 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Adding 160 to an 80M dipole? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary - AB9M" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:45:26 -0600
A Butternut HF-2V with 160 meter mod kit and top loaded (all 40 Meter loading shorted out) over two dozen 66 foot radials over glacial moraine pond bottom black soil over water bearing clay, has serv
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00254.html (10,302 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Adding 160 to an 80M dipole? (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 14:41:14 -0600
I guess I should have defined what I consider a short vertical, something around 50' high and top loaded. If you had a support 50' high for your inverted V you could have used it for a vertical and t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00257.html (9,943 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Adding 160 to an 80M dipole? (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:10:16 -0600
Back in the late 60's or early 70's I bought some surplus radio stuff; a Gibson Girl with a balloon with sea water activated hydrogen generator to inflate it so you could put up an antenna when there
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00273.html (11,050 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu