Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Alum\s+Masts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Alum\s+Masts\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Alum Masts (score: 1): Author: tbeltran@earthlink.net (Thomas Beltran); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:03:10 -0800; This discussion of Masts is quite timely for me. I was planning on using schedule 80 Aluminum pipe for a TH-3MKIII and perhaps a rotatable dipole for 17. Should I consider one of HRO's steel masts? T; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00246.html (8,173 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Alum Masts (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR)); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:17:21 -0500; As we have all heard me (and others) say before, the only thing made of aluminum that you should put in the air is an antenna. Masts, towers, bolts, nuts, lock washers "in the air" need to be steel.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00250.html (9,498 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Alum Masts (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:02:40 -0500; Tom, What you left out is how high above the tower top you planned to have the antenna(s). That makes all the difference. In general, I'd avoid the use of "pipe" of any kind for a structural componen; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00254.html (9,008 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Alum Masts (score: 1): Author: k2qmf@juno.com (k2qmf@juno.com); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:20:47 -0500; I was thinking of a Heights aluminum 60 foot crank-up tower! Specifications look great! Are you saying "Stay Away"?? 73, Ted K2QMF On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:17:21 -0500 "Bill Hider $N3RR$" <n3rr@erols; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00257.html (11,457 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Alum Masts (score: 1): Author: pbarkey@bsu.edu (Barkey, Patrick M.); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:24:08 -0500; Bill, You have every right to feel this way. But I find this sentiment, expressed in almost the same breath as your complete openness to the question of beam height vs. propagation objectives to be a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00263.html (10,933 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Alum Masts (score: 1): Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 22:28:50 -0500; Tom (et al): Here's what I sent to Frank W8HO earlier today in reply to his question about masts: Frank: If you finally decide on steel tubing for your mast, I'd recommend you call Joe Varva at Speci; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00264.html (10,081 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Alum Masts (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR)); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 20:24:41 -0500; Well, I didn't mean to be "jarring". :-) It's just a personal opinion about aluminum. Bill, N3RR Bill, You have every right to feel this way. But I find this sentiment, expressed in almost the same b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00271.html (12,100 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Alum Masts (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 23:55:08 EST; for Standard questions: What's your county windspeed rating (available from <A HREF="http://www.championradio.com">www.championradio.com</A> under Tech Notes)? What configuration and spacing are you; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00274.html (8,781 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Alum Masts (score: 1): Author: tbeltran@earthlink.net (Thomas Beltran); Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:00:33 -0800; Bill: I plan on using a 10" mast, three with the rotator mounted about three feet below the top of the tower, so 7 feet would stick out above the top of the tower. The guy at the industrial metal sup; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00283.html (10,836 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Alum Masts (score: 1): Author: w5kp@swbell.net (Jerry Kincade); Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 06:27:11 -0800; Tom, I wish you the best of luck, but be sure to plan for access around the tower for the $300 boom truck you'll need to safely lift that rig out the top after it's bent. At that point, the galvanize; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00285.html (12,743 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Alum Masts (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:28:12 -0600; WHOA ! Let's not go overboard here. Did you perform a stress analysis for the proposed system? He wants to put a TH3 and a 17M dipole on a 7 ft mast. Put the TH3 a few inches above and the 17M dipole; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00289.html (12,335 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]