Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Aluminum\s+Self\-Supporting\s+Towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Aluminum\s+Self\-Supporting\s+Towers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Aluminum Self-Supporting Towers (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 06:15:43 -0800 (PST); Wow! I wouldn't do it. First, I think aluminum is the wrong material to make a tower out of. I know one that formed stress cracks, like all aluminum tends to do. Unless it is a VERY expensive alloy,; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00103.html (7,436 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Aluminum Self-Supporting Towers (score: 1): Author: Ron.Stordahl@digikey.com (Ron Stordahl); Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 15:02:43 -0600; I have a Heights aluminum tower 72 feet high. I initially had a Mosley Pro 97 on it, a fairly heavy beam, I believe 100# with about 12 Sq Ft wind load. I probably had it overloaded. I have discovered; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00112.html (9,476 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Aluminum Self-Supporting Towers (score: 1): Author: dbowker@shire.sjv.net (Dave Bowker); Date: Thu, 27 Nov 1997 06:58:22 -0500; Does anyone have experience and/or advice to offer on use of aluminum self-supporting towers, such as the Universal Tower series, for supporting large arrays such as the Force 12's with 36' to 44' bo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00705.html (7,067 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Aluminum Self-Supporting Towers (score: 1): Author: k7sv@juno.com (Larry G Schimelpfenig); Date: Thu, 27 Nov 1997 08:23:58 EST; Dave, I had a 90 foot Universal rated at 8 sq feet as I recall some years back while I was still in ND. I had a 204BA on it. My first comment is that as soon as I had 40 feet of it up I decided there; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00707.html (8,406 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]