Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Aluminum\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Aluminum\s+towers\s*$/: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1): Author: "KR7X" <kr7x@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:41:24 -0700; Mario: That is nice but all your reference document links say 80mph, 90 mph etc. but do not say what exposure, whether the wind velocity is fastest mile or 3 sec gust or what loading specification th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00110.html (12,616 bytes)
42. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1): Author: EZ Rhino <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz>; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 18:41:51 -0600; 10 ACRES!!! For the love of mike, buy a bulldozer not a tower! I'd kill for 10 acres for an antenna farm. Chris KF7P Darn! I was hoping that everyone would either love or hate aluminium towers so I c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00111.html (9,242 bytes)
43. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:56:52 -0800; I had a 70' Universal Tower in IL and a 50' one in Aruba http://www.qrz.com/db/p40a . In Aruba it held up very well to the elements compared to my Rohn 55g tower which severe corrosion and required a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00115.html (10,200 bytes)
44. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:19:33 -0700; What is special about the base for this tower that eliminates the need for a rebar cage? Is the base itself a metal framework that functions as a rebar cage or something? Rick N6RK __________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00116.html (8,788 bytes)
45. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net; Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 21:30:54 -0400; Rick, This may answer your question: http://www.universaltowers.com/bases.html 73 Don N8DE _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk ma; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00117.html (9,717 bytes)
46. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1): Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 21:42:10 -0400; My impression is that the 21.06sf is the wind loading of the tower itself. 73 Alan NV8A _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk maili; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00118.html (10,767 bytes)
47. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:55:28 -0600; I would love to hear from a concrete engineer type if not using rebar is good idea or not. Mike W0MU W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net _______________________________________________ _______________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00119.html (10,263 bytes)
48. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 19:38:10 -0700; It seems like you would have to dig a triangular hole for this to be valid. That ought to be a neat trick. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ __________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00120.html (9,270 bytes)
49. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1): Author: "Mario" <marionow@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 23:26:29 -0400; I understand your question, but I have no answer for it. To get these details I would suggest to contact them directly. Bill Kedzierski 586-463-2560 univ@voyager.net Mario: That is nice but all your; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00122.html (13,270 bytes)
50. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:58:58 -0800; I guess you started the guying a freestanding tower discussion again. Hi Jerry, I have a Universal Tower in my back yard and am happy with it. As it is only part Universal (and part Heights) I decide; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00142.html (8,225 bytes)
51. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1): Author: w4lde <rwalters@numail.org>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 21:05:07 -0400; I wouldn't rule out the Aluma Tower made in Florida. The easiest installation I have been involved with. i have the HX50 which is 50ft and a SteppIR 3-element with 30/40 meter added wind-load and hav; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00145.html (9,491 bytes)
52. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1): Author: "Gedas" <w8bya@mchsi.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:39:07 -0400; I have 3 Universal towers; one 50' and two 70'. The 50' I have had up for 30 years at two different QTH's and I purchased it 2nd hand. Who knows how old it is. The two 70' towers have been up for abo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00152.html (12,881 bytes)
53. [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1): Author: "Larry stowell" <lclarks@nc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:12:30 -0400; Just for a heads-up take a look at Aluma Towers web site and the "Smart Tower" http://www.alumatower.com/smart_tower.html I have no connection with Aluma just a very satisfied customer. 73 Larry K1ZW; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00163.html (8,580 bytes)
54. [TowerTalk] aluminum towers (score: 1): Author: ronald long <rlong3@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:36:44 -0400; I have had an 80ft Heights Al tower up since 1976, and I bought it used back then! TH-11 on top. The first three sections might be unique in that the tubing is 0.25inch wall thickness. I originally i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00165.html (8,305 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 54
Page: [1] [2] [3]