Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Analyzer\s+and\s+AIM\s+comments\s+to\s+Jim\s+Lux\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Analyzer\s+and\s+AIM\s+comments\s+to\s+Jim\s+Lux\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Analyzer and AIM comments to Jim Lux (score: 1): Author: "Jay Terleski" <jayt@arraysolutions.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 08:57:12 -0500; Hi Jim, I ran your comments by Bob Clunn, the designer of the AIM and Power Aim Analyzers and he has responded below. Jay Bob Clunn's comments: It's interesting to see a detailed discussion of the is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00103.html (11,902 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Analyzer and AIM comments to Jim Lux (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:06:03 -0700; The AIM analyzer received a very positive review last year from Rudy Severns, N6LF. BUT -- Jim Lux's comments are entirely on target. EVERY measurement system has limitations, even the most expensive; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00105.html (10,337 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Analyzer and AIM comments to Jim Lux (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:50:37 -0400 (EDT); Interesting, thanks for the effort. Comments interspersed... --Original Message-- I fully agree on subjective evaluations of "usefulness" and the tendency of eham reviews to be distributed at the end; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00119.html (23,490 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Analyzer and AIM comments to Jim Lux (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:59:48 -0400 (EDT); --Original Message-- Heck, they've published multiple ap notes on it, and folks have written entire books, and doctoral dissertations on it. It's a very big deal in the microwave area where you are p; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00120.html (9,766 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Analyzer and AIM comments to Jim Lux (score: 1): Author: "Jay Terleski" <jayt@arraysolutions.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:47:07 -0500; Jim, I would like to thank you for taking the time to respond in such details. I need to print this out and read it carefully to make sure I can learn from it. Just wanted you to know I will not just; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00122.html (24,174 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]