Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Another\s+Ground\s+Radial\s+Question\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Another Ground Radial Question (score: 1)
Author: Kshaddrick <kshaddrick@jetup.net>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 13:32:43 -0500
Somewhere in the distant past I read that the radials of one antenna cannot overlap those of another. Is this really true? There are some folks who indicate that if the radials are insulated it shoul
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00385.html (7,245 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Another Ground Radial Question (score: 1)
Author: n8de@thepoint.net
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:25:11 -0400
Overlapping is OK. The only problem might develop when corrosion causes intermittent contact between radials. Of course, insulated wires avoid this situation, in most cases. Why not put down insulate
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00386.html (8,229 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Another Ground Radial Question (score: 1)
Author: "pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer2@q.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:08:58 -0700
" Individual ground systems are required for each tower of a multielemnt array . If the individual systems would overlap , the adjoining systems are usually terminated in a common bus." Under fig 20
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00388.html (8,931 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Another Ground Radial Question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 14:30:37 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
--Original Message-- If you have overlapping radial systems, inevitably, there's going to be some coupling between them (whether they are insulated or not, or buried or not, or elevated or not). As s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00390.html (9,178 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Another Ground Radial Question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 14:35:53 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
--Original Message-- A broadcast directional array would be a good example of something where you want the mutual coupling to be very stable, since that determines whether your nulls and lobes stay p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00391.html (9,923 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Another Ground Radial Question (score: 1)
Author: WA8JXM <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 19:51:39 -0400
"terminated in a common bus". I take that to mean they are tied together rather than overlap without touching? Ken _______________________________________________ ____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00393.html (8,054 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Another Ground Radial Question (score: 1)
Author: "pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer2@q.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 17:46:51 -0700
Yes - nothing overlaps without touching - visualize two radial fields lying so they overlap at about 1/4 of the diameter , then draw a straight line across where they overlap perpendcular to a line
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00394.html (8,979 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Another Ground Radial Question (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:20:45 -0500
Is it not possible to discuss this question by considering the design of two UHF verticals mounted on a car? The corollary of the original question would then suggest this is not possible, since you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00396.html (10,691 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Another Ground Radial Question (score: 1)
Author: "pehaire" <pehaire@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:08:57 -0500
I agree with you. It looks like to me that a half square could be thought of as 2 verticals each with one radial and the 2 radials attached or bonded together at their ends. Thus 2 verticals spaced a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00401.html (13,750 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Another Ground Radial Question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 07:23:42 -0700
In most phased array schemes, you're not looking for forward gain as much as reverse null depth. You can have huge phasing errors with small effect on gain: The gain (in dB) is 20*log10(1+cos(theta))
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00403.html (10,109 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu