- 1. [TowerTalk] Another tt40 Wilson Tower Query (score: 1)
- Author: w2cqm@juno.com
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:20:59 -0400
- Thanks to all of the Reflector readers who help identify my tower. It's the 2 section Wilson TT40 with the dual section pipe-in-pipe mast with the optional free standing rotator base. At the risk of
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00561.html (8,459 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Another tt40 Wilson Tower Query (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:49:39 -0700
- So you're going to use the garage and its structure and hopefully it will spread the loads out over your "suspect" soil. As opposed to a big hunk of concrete sitting in the ground (the usual tower ba
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00562.html (10,704 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Another tt40 Wilson Tower Query (score: 1)
- Author: Lee A Crocker <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
- Why would you knowingly put up a "self supporting" tower in unstable soil, and hope a few 2x4 toothpicks held together by a handful of nails, will make this structurally sound? It's the soil that pro
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00568.html (7,089 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu