Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\/Tower\s+Legal\s+Issues\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: "Dale M. Schwartz" <dale@immlawfirm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:52:53 +0000
I have an advance copy of Fred's book and it is terrific! I use it all the time to advise hams on zoning and other legal issues as an ARRL Volunteer Counsel. Dale. K4ROZ Dale M. Schwartz & Asso., Sui
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00444.html (8,315 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 07:50:48 -0500
It doesn't matter. The Calif. Supreme Court let stand without hearing the appeal, the Palmdale ruling that a dinky VHF antenna is sufficient for the enjoyment of ham radio. If that rolls on we're all
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00445.html (7,404 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: Charles Coldwell <coldwell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:08:13 -0400
[ ... ] As a resident of 5-land, it shouldn't matter to you! The decision doesn't matter outside the California border. -- Charles M. Coldwell, W1CMC "Turn on, log in, tune out" Belmont, Massachusett
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00455.html (8,030 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:30:29 -0700
Hi Charles. Do you REALLY believe that? If California can get away with it, why not Oregon? 73 Tom W7WHY As a resident of 5-land, it shouldn't matter to you! The decision doesn't matter outside the C
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00456.html (8,196 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: "R. Morris" <robrk@nidhog.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:38:09 -0400
It does matter to everyone. Courts and lawyers get information from everywhere. Many years ago the ARRL was nice enough to send copies of court findings from six states that had a direct effect on my
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00457.html (8,315 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: "Clint Talmadge W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:46:23 -0500
I disagree with Charles when he says that Robb, as a "5 lander" should not be concerned about a court decision in California. If for nothing else Robb should stand with all hams in the spirit of soli
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00459.html (9,032 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: K8RI on TT <k8ri-on-towertalk@tm.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:51:15 -0400
Which shows that like most of the public they are completely clueless about technical issues. California pretty much has their own way of doing things. I believe the CA supreme court which is the mos
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00465.html (8,166 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:36:45 -0500
You are probably thinking of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in S.F.; not the Cal. Supreme Court. How do you overrule a state supreme court? What if the U.S. Supreme Court doesn't decide to hear the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00466.html (8,239 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:08:50 -0700
Which reflector would that be? I'm not aware of any active ones. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00467.html (8,133 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: Charles Coldwell <coldwell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:00:46 -0400
I really believe that decisions of the California courts only have the force of law in California. However, I don't mean hams outside of California should be indifferent (although that is the most st
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00468.html (9,047 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: Charles Coldwell <coldwell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:01:45 -0400
Well, apparently the courts in California ignored many interpretations of PRB-1 from other states' courts that came to the opposite conclusion. -- Charles M. Coldwell, W1CMC "Turn on, log in, tune ou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00469.html (9,213 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Muller" <k0tv@k0tv.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:36:21 -0400
I hope you're not referring to Marchand v. Hudson (the NH Supreme Court decision that protects hams). Currently the only NH case law is Marchand. That case was my case and I have three 90 foot R-45 t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00477.html (11,703 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Muller" <k0tv@k0tv.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:35:32 -0400
A state supreme court can be overruled by any federal court. In this case, the state laws didn't provide reasonable accommodation. As to what is reasonable, there is some precedent that a VHF only an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00479.html (11,665 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Muller" <k0tv@k0tv.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:37:13 -0400
Correct, but other jurisdictions take notice although they're not bound. Because there's no opinion, there's nothing of which to take notice. Jerry - K0TV I really believe that decisions of the Calif
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00480.html (10,241 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:03:44 -0500
Jerry, thanks for clarifiying. 73 Rob K5UJ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00481.html (12,267 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu