Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+Analyzer\s+Suggestions\s+Solicited\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions Solicited (score: 1)
Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:36:11 +0000
I am looking for suggestions as to which Antenna Analyzer I should buy. Right now, I am leaning towards the MFJ-269. Mainly because I own a venerable (old) MFJ-259 which has provided me many years of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00125.html (6,857 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions Solicited (score: 1)
Author: "Phil & Debbie Salas" <dpsalas@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:43:49 -0600
I used an MFJ-259B for a long time (probably 10 years) and it served me well. However, a couple of years ago I bought an Array Solutions AIM4170. This is a lab-grade instrument which really spoiled m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00131.html (7,564 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions Solicited (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:55:38 -0600
I would recommend the AIM-4170 from Array Solutions. It is a bit more than your target, but you get a lot more too. I have one and it provides a lot of information about your antenna(s). I have used
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00133.html (8,370 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions Solicited (score: 1)
Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 22:20:41 +0000
It looks like the AA-200 fits the bill for me. The AIM 4170 is nice, BUT, hauling around a PC to use it is a major drawback. Thanks for all the replies, 73, Dick, W1KSZ ______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00136.html (9,099 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions Solicited (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:45:32 -0800
Dick, I'd give alternate advice. You already own a good unit that you can drag up to the top of a tower. I have one too. Keep it for that purpose. Buy the N2PK unit (best), the AIM 4170, or the Ten T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00138.html (7,963 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions Solicited (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:44:24 -0800
Just triggered a nit pick hot button for me... "lab-grade"... what EXACTLY does that mean? To me, that means: a) the uncertainty of the measurement is known and stated b) the calibration of the instr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00142.html (9,030 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions Solicited (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:47:38 -0800
N2PK is only available as a kit (otherwise I'd have one).. the AIM 4170, or the Ten Tec TAPR I heartily agree Hmmm. just how much error would you get from measuring a choke (compared to, say, a Agile
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00143.html (8,773 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions Solicited (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:48:05 -0800
range). That's AWFULLY far from 50 ohms. Now, a VNA could be made to work putting the choke in series between the two ports, but my TAPR doesn't get anywhere near that either. I DID get good data doi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00144.html (8,392 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions Solicited (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:03:59 -0500
Local fellers seem to admire the Palstar model... == K8JHR == I bought an Array Solutions AIM4170. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00145.html (8,146 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions Solicited (score: 1)
Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 06:48:08 +0000
The PALSTAR looks a lot like the MFJ. Bears looking into. Thanks, 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing lis
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00146.html (8,770 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions Solicited (score: 1)
Author: chas <chasm@texas.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:32:05 -0600
suggest you find one to play with first, that is blue on green lettering.. and SMALL so if you are the typical over65 ham, you are definitely going to need LIGHT source and CHEATERS to enlarge those
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00148.html (8,846 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions Solicited (score: 1)
Author: "Phil & Debbie Salas" <dpsalas@tx.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 05:44:43 -0600
"Just triggered a nit pick hot button for me... "lab-grade"... what EXACTLY does that mean?" Well, to me it means similar in accuracy to the kind of equipment I used in the RF lab back in my working
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00150.html (8,732 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions Solicited (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:17:52 +0000
I have the MFJ259B and the Palstar ZM30. These are what I see as the relative advantages: ZM30 * Better constructed * More frequency stable - synthesized * Field programmable for software updates MFJ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00151.html (8,903 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu