Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+Heights\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+Heights\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Antenna Heights (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:10:58 -0400; Remember, that when we talk of "best heights" that is a statistical number and is not always the best height. I don't have the numbers in front of me, but there was a good article in QST I believe la; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00419.html (7,270 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Heights (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:09:07 -0700; Wrong on one count -- soil does NOT affect the pattern or performance of horizontally polarized antennas. And the "best" part of this equation is the optimum vertical angle for propagation, which doe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00420.html (7,953 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Heights (score: 1): Author: Gene Smar <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:09:33 -0500 (CDT); TT: Might telescoping/crankup towers provide the best of all worlds, then? 73 de Gene Smar AD3F Remember, that when we talk of "best heights" that is a statistical number and is not always the best h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00421.html (8,196 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Heights (score: 1): Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:36:51 -0500; "Best height" also depends on what you're trying to do. The best height for working DX might suck if you're trying to play in SS. The best height for SS from VE4 might be marginal from Connecticut. S; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00422.html (9,308 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Heights (score: 1): Author: Bry Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:08:46 -0400; It sure seemed to help W1BB to have his inverted Vee beam antenna installed directly over salt water on cape cod!! Best regards - Brian Carling AF4K Crystals Co. 117 Sterling Pine St. Sanford, FL 327; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00428.html (9,144 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Heights (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:46:52 +0000; soil conditions. Its also dependent on time... what is good at 0600z is likely not so good at 1000z from here. that is why multiple antennas at a range of heights is 'Best'! I have 10m antennas from; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00429.html (8,444 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Heights (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 03:48:20 +0200; Soil condition does not affect the pattern, but the gain of the horizontal polarized antenna. 73 Peter Wrong on one count -- soil does NOT affect the pattern or performance of horizontally polarized; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00432.html (8,910 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Heights (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 01:02:15 -0400; Isn't the terrain taken into account when modeling? 73 Roger (K8RI) Wrong on one count -- soil does NOT affect the pattern or performance of horizontally polarized antennas. And the "best" part of th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00433.html (9,167 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Heights (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 01:51:12 -0400; Theoretically the crank-up would work for finding the "best height", but I'd think this is where the advantage for stacked, switchable arrays, with diversity reception would excel. (for the few who c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00434.html (12,862 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]