Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+Interactions\s+\-\s+Reradiated\s+Noise\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+Interactions\s+\-\s+Reradiated\s+Noise\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Antenna Interactions - Reradiated Noise? (score: 1): Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:01:32 -0500; I read this on another list ... "It does reradiate enough noise, if not detuned, to mask weak signals on my receiving antennas ..." I have read of passive antennas used as passive repeaters, so it do; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00554.html (7,461 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Interactions - Reradiated Noise? (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:59:42 -0700; The receiving antennas typically used on 160m and 80m are not very efficient (they make poor transmitting antennas), but they have good directivity and therefore discriminate against noise coming fro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00558.html (8,072 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Interactions - Reradiated Noise? (score: 1): Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 20:32:52 -0500; I can see this on my little low band installation here. It's really only a problem if you have resonant conductors of the same polarization less than a wavelength from the antenna with the good patt; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00592.html (8,977 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]