Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+Peformance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+Peformance\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Antenna Peformance (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 12:10:22 -0800; Well, off the top of my head, you are claiming greater than 12.75db over the other station. You need to get with your buddy and see what's wrong with his antenna. A beam it isn't. 73 Ed -- FAQ on WW; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00362.html (7,912 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Antenna Peformance (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Jan & Del Seay); Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 06:35:55 -0000; Well, off the top of my head, you are claiming greater than 12.75db over the other station. You need to get with your buddy and see what's wrong with his antenna. A beam it isn't. 73 Ed Well, not nec; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00364.html (8,109 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Antenna Peformance (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 12:43:56; Take a look at the vertical patterns of a couple of tribanders at 64 and 48 feet, on various bands. I'll bet you'll find several take-off angles at which the difference between the two is at least th; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00367.html (8,373 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Antenna Peformance (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 19:11:17 +0800; Hi Pete. Also, who is higher in elevation, etc. I have 3 elements on 20 at 35 feet and a friend has 4 at 60 feet and I'm consistantly beating him out. But the location here is about 400 feet higher.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00369.html (8,714 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Antenna Peformance (score: 1): Author: kz5qdx@COMMUNIQUE.NET (Douglas Bradford); Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 13:45:48 -0600; --51802C7C0B3138862B5177DD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit No way on 50 % of the paths. I ran argonaut 509 at 110 feet , confirmed 315 on 3 watts. but a gud; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00388.html (10,797 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Antenna Peformance (score: 1): Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com); Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 19:28:02 EST; << Well, off the top of my head, you are claiming greater than 12.75db over the other station. >> Not true, I routinely have bumped other high power stations using QRP or low power. A good location i; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00391.html (7,395 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Antenna Peformance (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 22:36:29 -0600; writes: 12.75db over using QRP or low opinion. Paul, So are good tactics, in my opinion. Dale, kg5u -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Ad; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00394.html (7,605 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Antenna Peformance (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 15:38:05 -0800 (PST); Who says the winner in any pileup is the loudest signal? Timing your call is at LEAST as important as being 10 dB louder than the next guy. Sometimes, I would deliberately take weaker callers just t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00416.html (7,800 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]