Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+Recommendation\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Antenna Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:05:19 -0500
A friend is looking for a beam that covers 40 thru 10 meters. Pickings seem to be slim! Any recommendations pro or con? 73, Roger -- Remember the Liberty (AGTR-5) http://www.usslibertyveterans.org/ h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00332.html (6,919 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: k6ye@q.com
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:16:49 -0500 (EST)
Roger, A few antennas come to mind. I am using a Force-12 C4XLD (now called Delta-4XSL) and it works fairly well. Other choices are: SteppIR (several choices), Mosley PRO-67C, M2 7-10-30LP8, and Opti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00337.html (8,124 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:18:13 -0700
Force 12 6BA is also a candidate, though they have so many ways of labeling things it may be the same antenna. It lacks 30 meters, but has the rest. Larry Wo0Z _______________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00339.html (9,661 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:44:37 -0500 (EST)
seem to be slim! Any recommendations pro or con? You bet. If you can't afford the 3L SteppIR with the 30/40 elements which works very well, the Force 12 C-4 works FB with no moving parts. Our triban
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00340.html (7,909 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:54:59 -0700
SteppIR ?? 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00341.html (9,374 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:06:45 -0800 (PST)
There are some who will disagree but my vote goes strongly for the Mosley.  I had a Mosley PRO67B up in severe storm and ice prone central Ohio for 15 years.  During that time I managed DXCC Honor Ro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00351.html (11,859 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: "David Jordan" <wa3gin@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:42:45 -0500
It would be helpful if the questioner provided more insight into what the operator was trying to achieve with the quad band antenna. Does he rag chew or is he only interested in DX or is he 'just' a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00352.html (10,122 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: Todd Coulter <Coulter@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:14:05 -0500
I would look atOptibeam <http://optibeam.de/>. They are great performers ,built extremely well, and fantastic antennas all around. Their customer service is great and you won't be disappointed. Good
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00353.html (8,577 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: Greg <ab7r@cablespeed.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:17:59 -0800
I've had an Optibeam OB12/6 in service for about 6 years now. Not one issue since putting it on the HG70HD tower. It covers 40-10M with at least 2 elements for each band. This is the best built anten
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00354.html (9,437 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: Jack White <m5pro@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:35:47 +0000
I like many others was in this situation. After weighing up the pros and cons for what seemed like an age ie: price, performance, wind load, reliability, resale value should I upgrade, longevity and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00355.html (9,306 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:16:15 -0700
I also have a pair of Optibeam antennas (OB16-3 and OB2-40) that have been great. They perform exactly as specified with no extra tuning, and they have held up to the horrendous wind gusts that regul
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00362.html (11,614 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: SPWoo <jj_2_woo@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:06:40 -0800 (PST)
I understand all the rave about trapless antennas.  I have one too, a trapless tribander with 3 elements on 20m, 3 elements on 15m, and 4 elements on 10m.  And I have purchased Steve's comparison rep
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00365.html (9,178 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: "Mike & Becca Krzystyniak" <k9mk@flash.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:46:33 -0600
If you are not chasing minor differences in dB's or the various ways these antennas are designed and assembled, then that leaves the soft factors such as cost and reliabilty. Like comparing car manuf
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00001.html (9,155 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu