Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+analyzer\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+analyzer\s*$/: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer (score: 1): Author: nx7k@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (Wayne Bailey); Date: Sun, 05 Oct 1997 04:28:22 +0000; I haved been considering purchasing an Antenna Analyzer. Does anyone have any recommendation and experiences to impart to me before I leap. 73 de Wayne, NX7K -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00092.html (7,345 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer (score: 1): Author: wa3afs@soli.inav.net (Bruce Goldstein); Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 09:41:07 +0000; I have been using the MFJ 259 analyzer for several years. Aside from having to to resolder the SO239, it has works flawlessly. I use it most every day to set the antenna tuner plus setting up or chec; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00095.html (7,295 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer (score: 1): Author: ki0dz@juno.com (Mary-Frances R. Bartels); Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 17:58:33 MST; Wayne, Depends on exactly what you're looking for and the price. I recently purchased the MFJ-259 from Gerald at Texas Towers. For my purposes it works just fine. I'm told that its warts include weak; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00102.html (8,570 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer (score: 1): Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole); Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 23:55:45 -0400 (EDT); If u want an MFJ, get the one with the freq. meter built in. Without that, u must have a rcvr near the test instrument--and usually that is not possible. de K4VUD -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00108.html (7,361 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer (score: 1): Author: nx7k@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (Wayne Bailey); Date: Sat, 11 Oct 1997 01:19:39 +0000; I requested information about either the MFJ or Autek Antenna Analyzers Here is the results I received 26 responses 22 recommeneded the MFJ 7 had both the MFJ and Autek generally stated the MFJ Easie; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00303.html (7,708 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer (score: 1): Author: kk6t@joneslumber.com (Terry Dunlap); Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 13:41:53 -0500; While we are on the subject of antenna analyzers, let me pose this question to the group. I have owned a MFJ 249 for a couple of years and have a problem with it. From the time it is turned on, the f; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00295.html (7,134 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer (score: 1): Author: jcowens1@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:29:05 +0000 (UTC); I need an antenna analyzer that provides impedance information. I have the predecesor to the MFJ-259B, and have been disappointed in it when the frequency of interest is near the band overlap areas o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00277.html (7,688 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer (score: 1): Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:47:52 -0500; Buy a RigExpert model from VE3DZ. Several to choose from. The one that cost about 375 is the one I have that doesn't cover UHF. Guarantee you will be glad you did. Best purchase I have made in a kong; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00278.html (8,272 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer (score: 1): Author: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:46:13 -0500; Comet makes an alternative as well. http://www.cometantenna.com/products.php?CatID=1&famID=10&childID=20 It seemed to be of considerably higher quality when I saw it at Hamcom. 73, Joe kk0sd --Origin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00283.html (8,970 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] antenna analyzer (score: 1): Author: foxbw@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:47:37 +0000 (UTC); For my 2 cents, (actually about $600.00) you cannot beat the Array Solutions AIM 4170C. I bought mine 2 months ago and every time I use it I find another great feature. Not only does it do all the us; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00284.html (7,369 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer (score: 1): Author: Bill Aycock <baycock2@centurytel.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:42:15 -0500; Joe- Their MSRP link is bad. I Hate it when sources make us jump through hoops to try to do business. I'm loosing interest fast. Bill--W4BSG _______________________________________________ __________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00286.html (10,185 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer (score: 1): Author: jcowens1@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:19:00 +0000 (UTC); My thanks to the many folks who took time to respond. I have lots of opinions and options now and a appreciate all of them. Thank you. John Owens - 賫7TK Celebrating over 50 Years in Ham Radio No. 1; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00293.html (7,447 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzer (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:28:58 -0400; I know we've discussed this before, but I couldn't find the specific information. What are the best antenna analyzers for the Ham market? I'm referring to both portable and computer based. I have not; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-07/msg00191.html (6,950 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzer (score: 1): Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:18:54 -0500; I use the miniVNA, which I like very much, the smaller, cheaper, older version. However, I am lusting after DG8SAQ version of VNWA. That one looks real slick. ed K0KL ________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-07/msg00193.html (8,576 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzer (score: 1): Author: "Dick Dievendorff" <dieven@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:19:57 -0700; You'll get a lot of anectodal responses, including mine. I had a RigExpert AA-54 and loved it. I wanted one with a Smith Chart so I bought a RigExpert AA-1000 and also love it. I also have an Array S; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-07/msg00194.html (8,626 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzer (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:23:36 -0400; What are you dissatisfied with regarding the MFJ analyzer? I know we've discussed this before, but I couldn't find the specific information. What are the best antenna analyzers for the Ham market? I'; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-07/msg00195.html (7,768 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzer (score: 1): Author: "Mike" <hinrgdj@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:25:50 -0500; My vote is for the AIM4170! Mike, K4EAR _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-07/msg00196.html (8,529 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzer (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:28:50 -0700; Roger, Thanks to a suggestion from W8AEF, I found the VNWA, designed by Tom, DG8SAQ, and sold fully built by some hams in the UK for about $750, shipped to the US. I've had mine for a little over a m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-07/msg00197.html (8,259 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzer (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:34:47 -0400; For PC-based, any of the W5BIG analyzers sold through Array Solutions are good candidates. If you don't need VHF+ capabilities, the N2PK VNA is excellent. Mine was supplied by M0WWA who builds them; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-07/msg00199.html (8,485 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzer (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:53:24 -0400; Forgot to mention that a very powerful attribute of the software-based VNAs is that in many instances, accurate Z measurements can be made at the rig end of a coaxial cable and you don't need to know; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-07/msg00200.html (10,066 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]