Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+analyzers\s+and\s+parallel\s+conductortransmissionlines\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+analyzers\s+and\s+parallel\s+conductortransmissionlines\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzers and parallel conductortransmissionlines (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 20:05:59 -0600; I would hook up a balun to that balanced feedline and use the SO239 analyzer. Keith NM5G --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behal; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00080.html (9,296 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzers and parallel conductortransmissionlines (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:51:55 -0800; The top of the line MFJ (the one that does UHF) has an N. Oh Ho.... yes, but... Theoretically, you need a well characterized transformer/balun, but, of course, the ham analyzers don't have any means; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00087.html (11,097 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzers and parallel conductortransmissionlines (score: 1): Author: Steve <steveac@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:39:48 -0500; Hi Jim, Thanks for the insight. Any idea of what degree of inaccuracy might be introduced by the parasitic asymetric capacitance in the HF range if one were to connect ladder line to an analyzer's SO; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00112.html (13,163 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]