Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+loads\s+for\s+rohn\s+45\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab8al@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
Can anyone tell me what kind of antenna load I can stack on Rohn 45? I am looking at 130' of tower with a 4 element (full size) 40 Meter at the 130 foot mark but would like to stack 6X6 60ft boom 20
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00282.html (6,787 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Tipton, W5DMT" <dave@w5dmt.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:58:59 -0500
18 Square Feet is the max windload for 130 feet of Rohn 45 and the normal 3 sets of guys. I've always heard you don't add a 4th set of guys due to something about compressing the base too much. The w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00284.html (8,771 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Gehring <steven.gehring@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:08:44 -0800
Check the Rohn 45 brochure: http://www.rohnnet.com/resourcesmodule/download_resource/id/547/src/@random48ecf1c8a9734/ As the other put it, I also believe it'll be severely overloaded with the three a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00285.html (8,735 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:34:25 -0400
What load with the "solid leg" 45G handle? 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00287.html (9,544 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Gehring <steven.gehring@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:33:37 -0800
I don't know. Tell us! 73. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00294.html (10,776 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 02:53:35 -0400
I asked first. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00300.html (11,600 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:39:47 -0400
I doubt solid legs would change the load rating much, but they would be very nice for towers installed in corrosive locations. Does Rohn really make a solid leg 45g tower? John P40A What load with th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00318.html (8,341 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri-on-towertalk@tm.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:35:24 -0400
To quote the 45G is constructed on and 18" equilateral triangle patter, utilizing 1 1/2" OD , 14 Gauge , special quality steel tubing, of solid steel rod legs. They say it's available, but don't list
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00319.html (9,703 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:40:03 EDT
Actually @ 70 MPH, it'll take 21 sq. ft. per Rohn specs. Don't forget to add back in the 8.0 sq.ft. that they take off of the tower capacity for a symmetrical antenna mount which you're not going to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00321.html (8,655 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 08:14:22 -0700
I doubt solid legs would change the load rating much, but they would be very nice for towers installed in corrosive locations. Does Rohn really make a solid leg 45g tower? John P40A in EU. Trylon mak
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00331.html (10,311 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:19:15 EDT
very nice for towers installed in corrosive locations. Umm, actually it would change the load rating significantly. Especially since tower capacity is a direct function of leg strength. I'm not aware
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00338.html (8,595 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:12:02 -0700
I'm not so sure about that. Most towers are limited by the buckling load on the various short segments of tubing which are quite slender (that is, you consider it a slender column from one joint wher
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00340.html (11,556 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 16:05:20 -0400
They apparently did at one time. They are described in the construction of the 45G as being available with both tubular and solid legs, but I've found no other reference. It looks like they did offer
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00343.html (9,867 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:16:15 -0400
Apparently solid leg Rohn 45 does exist (model# 45GSR) and its windload ratings are quite impressive - similar to Rohn 65G. John KK9A very nice for towers installed in corrosive locations. Umm, actua
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00354.html (8,902 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:58:03 -0700
But what's the cost comparison? My gut feel is that 65G would be cheaper than 45G. 65 is also larger overall diameter than 45, which helps with the overall buckling load (you have to figure out the l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00355.html (9,306 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Antenna loads for rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:26:27 -0700
I am looking at 130' of tower with a 4 element (full size) 40 Meter at the 130 foot mark but would like to stack 6X6 60ft boom 20 meter antennas one at 135 the other at 73". The phyllistran guys woul
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00407.html (10,520 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu