Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antennas\s+down\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antennas\s+down\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Antennas down (score: 1): Author: majrabsr@rconnect.com (Major Ron); Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:29:37 -0000; We here in SW MN had freezing rain and high winds SAT night & SUN morning. My HyGain 205CA, 155CA and 105CA are history. Broken elements on all of them and broken boom on 205. 155 & 105 booms are sev; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00367.html (8,116 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Antennas down (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net (Don Havlicek); Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:40:48 -0500; Ron Educate us! What was the orientation of those antennas to the wind direction when they 'failed' the stress test? What was the amount of radial ice on them? Were they stacked in a Xmas tree? If so; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00369.html (9,632 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Antennas down (score: 1): Author: kq2m@mags.net (Robert Shohet); Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:16:47 -0500; HI Ron, Sorry to hear about your ice storm and the antenna damage. Very frustrating indeed! Here is SW Connecticut we unfortunately get ice storms several times each fall and winter although we have; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00371.html (12,755 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Antennas down (score: 1): Author: majrabsr@rconnect.com (Major Ron); Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:32:08 -0000; OK Don (and All), The antennas were stacked in 'normal' Christmas tree fashion. There was about 1/4" to 3/8" (measurements were taken on the ground AFTERWARDS) of ice after the freezing rain, which t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00374.html (11,557 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Antennas down (score: 1): Author: ve6yc@shaw.ca (Peter Larsen); Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:36:48 -0700; Wasn't it an inch of radial ice on the F12 pictures about a week ago? I wonder how the F12 turned out. We had gusts of 85 Kph last night, but no ice. No antennas down here, because no antennas up :-; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00383.html (8,275 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Antennas down (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 22:12:54 -0500; That F12 was fine when the ice melted. That's the usual story with those. Wasn't it an inch of radial ice on the F12 pictures about a week ago? I wonder how the F12 turned out. We had gusts of 85 Kph; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00387.html (9,384 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Antennas down (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:23:06 -0600; N4KG: Do you mean the super thin wall 7/16 inch diameter Element TIPS failed? I HATE those flimsy HyGain end tips. Too bad someone ( HELLO TEXAS TOWERS ) doesn't sell heavier wall 7/16 inch O.D. repl; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00388.html (12,035 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Antennas down (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR)); Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 06:44:58 -0500; Ron, I have 2 each of those three antennas, spread over two towers, at heights from 50 ft to 141 ft. See: www.erols.com/n3rr I live in an area where the wind is funneled down into a trough and blows; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00395.html (14,364 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Antennas down (score: 1): Author: w5kp@swbell.net (Jerry Kincade); Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 06:27:57 -0800; My iced-up Force 12 came out just fine, but mainly because I was lucky and didn't get the incredibly high winds that Ron got after it iced up. Under the wind conditions he was talking about, mine wou; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00397.html (9,865 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]