Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Any\s+BN\-86\s+Balun\s+Replacement\s+Suggestions\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Any BN-86 Balun Replacement Suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:44:41 -0700
Unless you're measuring at the end of a long line that is swamping a much higher SWR at the antenna, your definition of "an SWR problem" is quite different from mine. I'm thrilled if the SWR at the f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00136.html (7,305 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Any BN-86 Balun Replacement Suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: Pat Barthelow <aa6eg@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:32:51 -0700
Eric, and group. Amen to Jim's reply about 1.2:1 being quite acceptable, quite good actually, and in no need of extra effort to reduce.... Take a look at the bottom of the page of the LP 1017 data sh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00137.html (10,591 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Any BN-86 Balun Replacement Suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:45:03 -0700
OK, I just took a look at the manual for the BN-86. It appears to be a simple common mode choke. My guess is that it fails because the common mode impedance is not sufficiently high over the range of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00139.html (8,115 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Any BN-86 Balun Replacement Suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: "N2TK" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:21:56 -0400
I have had a few BN-86's fail with the core breaking. I do not know if that was due to lightning, transmitting on the wrong band or that it just couldn't handle 1500W. Replaced some with BN-2000 HyGa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00140.html (9,662 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Any BN-86 Balun Replacement Suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: Lee Buller <k0wa@swbell.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
I have replaced the BN-86 with a 1:1 balun from Radio Works. Worked OK. I think it was rated at 4 KW. Typical SWR curve after replacement. Just used hose clamps to attach it to the boom. You could al
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00141.html (7,848 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Any BN-86 Balun Replacement Suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: Pat Barthelow <aa6eg@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:56:52 -0700
That is what I did for a replacement balun on the 6.2-30Mhz Log Periodic. The MFJ 259 manual shows a neat way to check for any unexpected series (low impedance) resonances in the hand wound coil, wh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00142.html (8,679 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Any BN-86 Balun Replacement Suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:35:29 -0400
Jim, The BN-86 is a standard voltage balun; trifilar winding on a ferrite rod. Common failure mode is due to excessive voltage and arc over at high SWR. If I recall correctly the worst case is using
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00143.html (10,178 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Any BN-86 Balun Replacement Suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:55:58 -0700
Interesting. The "instruction manual" describes it as a "current balun." See link below. http://www.hy-gain.com/man/pdf/BN-86.pdf Since you've apparently taken one apart and looked at it, it appears
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00144.html (7,812 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Any BN-86 Balun Replacement Suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:22:33 -0400
I have a couple of them around in good shape if anyone needs one....cheap. -Mike Interesting. The "instruction manual" describes it as a "current balun." See link below. http://www.hy-gain.com/man/pd
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00146.html (9,526 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Any BN-86 Balun Replacement Suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:50:44 -0400
Yes, I've autopsied a few blown BN-86 baluns in the last 30 years <G>. Notice the "Current Balun" in the upper right is a different type face than the rest of the manual. I think someone is playing
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00147.html (10,094 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Any BN-86 Balun Replacement Suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:02:03 -0700
The point I've been trying to drive home is that a TRUE W2DU design is a very good one, and that the multiturn coaxial ferrite chokes I've developed are a major improvement over the W2DU design that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00148.html (8,927 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Any BN-86 Balun Replacement Suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: "Rich Hallman - N7TR" <rich@n7tr.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:52:05 -0700
I had a stack of TH7's for many years...BN-86's died and I replaced with the BN-4000. No problems ever with these...Almost indestructible. http://www.hy-gain.com/man/pdf/BN-4000B.pdf 73 Rich N7TR TT
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00153.html (9,385 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Any BN-86 Balun Replacement Suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Germino <ad6aa@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
When I've attempted to stress a choke by putting it at a very high voltage point and shove a lot of power to it, it will typically fail by melting the coax. If the heat source (the transmitter power)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00156.html (8,816 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu