Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Are\s+higher\s+HF\s+\&\s+$6m$\s+antenna\'s\s+really\s+better\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Are\s+higher\s+HF\s+\&\s+$6m$\s+antenna\'s\s+really\s+better\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF & (6m) antenna's really better? (score: 1): Author: ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca (Mike & Coreen Smith); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 21:58:18 -0400; Enjoying the discussion! Although this is an "HF" question, let me add my 2c about the Magic 50MHz band as well. (I've been on HF though since '78 & 6M since '91) On 6m I almost always have had multi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00272.html (14,670 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF & (6m) antenna's really better? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:40:49 -0600; KL7RA (or KL7Y) made the exact same comment about his several 10M options (low stack, high stack, High single Yagi, and Low single Yagi). Tom N4KG ____________________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00278.html (7,906 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]