Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Are\s+higher\s+HF\s+antenna\'s\s+really\s+better\?\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: ke5rs@cox-internet.com (John Benedict)
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 17:53:56 -0600
Hello Group I have 100 feet of 45G tower and would like to put up a 36 boom Mosley Pro-95 multi-band antenna. I would like to find out how high I should put the antenna in order to get the best perfo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00219.html (9,056 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:44:17 EST
First of all, the best height for Mosley antenna installation is in the box on the floor of your garage. Apparently you haven't read the K7LXC and N0AX tribander comparison report where we test 2-3 d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00227.html (10,548 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:17:02 -0600
There must be hundreds of posts on 'optimum heights / takeoff angles in the Tower Talk archives. Bottom Line: NO SINGLE Height will cover ALL of the angles supported by the ionosphere. You need BOTH
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00229.html (13,555 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: k4rv@mindspring.com (Sain'T Tom)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:12:06 -0000
I once used 2 of the same 3 element 15 meter yagis simultaneously from my old QTH in South Carolina. One was at 70 feet on the tower top and was rotatable. The other was fixed on Europe at 40 feet. B
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00236.html (10,867 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: brewerj@squared.com (brewerj@squared.com)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:44:10 -0500
You mean the information you can't read unless you pay $17 ? John ________________________________________________________________________ This list is sponsored by the new eHam.net Store. When you b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00237.html (10,205 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:29:05 -0500
I think band and sunspot cycle phase have a lot to do with this. Certainly, as N4KG says, if you can have multiple antennas there are lots of reasons to do so, including but not limited to stacking.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00238.html (11,488 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: kr1g@hotmail.com (ted demopoulos)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:13:35
I've got 4/4 on 20m at 100 and 50 feet. The stack is usually louder to Europe BUT: often in the afternoon, maybe 1900z or so, the lower antenna is signifantly better, a couple of "S-Units." I rarely
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00240.html (13,389 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (Michael Watts)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Hey, I have no problem with people being paid money for work they have done. Maybe some people have forgotten that in a society where people are free to do as they please, there evolves a system in w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00241.html (12,384 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: w7gk@qsl.net (Dave)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:25:31 -0800
My understanding is a yagi performs as good as it possibly can when it is 1 electrical wavelength above the ground. Any additional height is redundant. 73, Dave Hough, W7GK Elko, NV _________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00247.html (10,384 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:19:12 -0500
TT: It's money well spent. I bought both copies. The first convinced me to look at the Bencher, the second convinced me to buy it. No regrets. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F --Original Message-- From: brewerj@
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00248.html (11,085 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 14:11:38 -0500
Dave, look at W3LPL, KC1XX et al, with 200-foot-high yagis on 20 and 15, and ask yourself whether people who build stations like that would waste their money if one wavelength high was enough. 73, Pe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00249.html (9,331 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:25:15 -0500
Dave, "...as good as it possibly can..." is in the eyes of the beholder. To where do you wish to communicate? (place on the earth, or elsewhere) When do wish to communicate? (Time of day, season, sun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00251.html (12,177 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:48:30 -1000
An excellent "book" on this subject was published in 1993 by LTA and the Radio Bookstore. Book is by R. Dean Straw, N6BV, titled "All the Right Angles". The book is full of detailed data, charts, com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00252.html (10,258 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: cdietz@swbell.net (Logan Dietz)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:01:34 -0600
Much of this is in the current ARRL Antenna Book, which also includes a disk. It will tell you the arrival angle from various QTHs so that antenna heights can be calculated to take advantage of the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00253.html (9,756 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:20:04 -0500
I think that over-simplifies the rule of thumb. Think of it this way -- horizontal yagi's just start to become effective at about 1/2 wavelength. Lower heights tend to distort the pattern. Heights ab
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00256.html (11,493 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:21:57 -0500
But these guys don't just put one antenna on these high towers. They load them up with yagis all driven in a stack. I'm sure these guys rarely find conditions where a SINGLE yagi above 1.5 wavelength
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00258.html (10,642 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:39:08 -0500
Happens all the time in contests. But that isn't the point. Contesters need/want an infinite number of antennas from which to choose for every condition that may occur. It's a matter of expense and h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00259.html (12,186 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:52:28 -0600
SNIP I recall that article also. To me, his observations are highly suspect. ANY antenna higher than 3/4 WL will exhibit a NULL in the vertical pattern and ANY antenna around half that height will fi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00260.html (11,747 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:24:46 -0600
Those observations seem reasonable to me. If you had 2 high stacks on 10 and 15M with the bottom antenna at 40 ft, I expect you would observe more incidents of the low antenna being better. Location
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00261.html (15,873 bytes)

20. [TowerTalk] Are higher HF antenna's really better? (score: 1)
Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry )
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 22:16:18 -0000
I have 3 TH7s on one tower - 25, 40 and 76 ft. There are plenty of times the TH7 at 25 ft is better into Europe than either of the 2 higher antennas or the upper 2 phased, on 10m. The lowest antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00262.html (18,380 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu