Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ask\s+the\s+Experts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ask\s+the\s+Experts\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Ask the Experts (score: 1): Author: kk5oq@datastar.net; Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:49:05 -0600 (CST); I am coming up on retirement after 32 years in the .mil world. I want to put up a self supporting crank up type tower (70') and a 40-10 meter non trap type yagi beam antenna. I looked at the Optibeam; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00645.html (7,034 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the Experts (score: 1): Author: Mirko S57AD <miroslav.sibilja@amis.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:27:10 +0100; Hi Charles, I think that your choice (OptiBeam OB12-4) is excellent, as saw I in our club it is well designed and well made. In despite we too have severe winds at Adriatic Sea coast with gusts up to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00646.html (8,442 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the Experts (score: 1): Author: kk5oq@datastar.net; Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:16:35 -0600 (CST); Thanks for all the reply's. Zig, km9 , I don't know about that sharing part :). The xyl was very understanding. When I mentioned about putting up a bigger antenna and why ( always try to explain ) he; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00678.html (9,379 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: Martin Staffa <geitaemort@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 07:03:49 -0700 (PDT); First time tower erector. I have aTX-438 crank up with a Yaesu G-800S rotor. I would like to put a Mosley Pro 67-C Any suggestions Would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Martin N1KGP73 ________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00191.html (6,623 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:13:17 EDT; rotor. I would like to put a Mosley Pro 67-C Any suggestions Would be greatly appreciated. Umm, hate to be a party pooper but my suggestion would be to put up anything but the Mosley PRO. They don't; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00243.html (7,529 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: "Bob Good" <k4bg@planters.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 22:07:49 +0100; Gents, I have seen several poor opinions of the Mosley "Pro Series" beams, in particular the Pro - 67... I have a very old Pro 57A at 70 feet that was used when I put it up in 1999. I run a max of 50; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00280.html (7,587 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu; Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:46:37 -0700; Nobody said it doesn't work. In fact, as Tom Schiller pointed out in his (fairly) recent QST article, "Everything works!" In a careful comparison the Moseley Pro came out poorly against the competiti; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00281.html (7,899 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: "Dick, W1KSZ" <w1ksz@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:06:01 -0400; This "Mosley Bashing" has finally hit my button !! I have a PRO-57A and am very satisfied with it. It is my understanding that subsequent models were "improved". I have not seen any published data fr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00282.html (9,208 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 12:01:31 EDT; I have a PRO-57A and am very satisfied with it. It is my understanding that subsequent models were "improved". I have not seen any published data from verifiable sources except those peddling their "; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00291.html (9,638 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: Gene Smar <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 13:43:48 -0500 (CDT); <snip> Cheers, Steve K7LXC co-author of the aforementioned reports available at _www.championradio.com_ (http://www.championradio.com) And well worth it. Steve's report convinced I could buy the Benc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00296.html (7,659 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 15:37:18 -0500; Not to mention, I found out why our KT4XAs didn't outperform my C3E. I know the kind of unpleasantness that the report generated but I sure wish it would be updated to include some of the newer anten; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00301.html (9,287 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 19:11:27 -0500; I can speak about my Mosley experience! I have owned and used numerous brands of antennas. This includes a homebrew 6 element 15m monobander a long time ago. But most recently, I have been able to co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00311.html (16,171 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 21:30:13 -0400; Radiation angle comes from ground reflection and it has nothing to do with the yagi's design. Testing different yagis at the same height in the same location is a fair test. John KK9A <snip> Yeah I d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00322.html (9,133 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 04:03:00 +0200; I am not sure. As long they are compared by measurements in their main lobe which will be same angle at the same height above ground it will be fine. With a field strength measurement and the receivi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00325.html (8,910 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 12:24:51 -0700; And YOU have hit mine!!! Do you have a clue about how much work it takes to obtain ACCURATE data on the performance of an antenna? To measure the gain, you must build the antenna, get it up in the a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00337.html (10,092 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: "Julio Peralta" <jperalta@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:57:15 -0400; AMEN Julio, W4HY And YOU have hit mine!!! Do you have a clue about how much work it takes to obtain ACCURATE data on the performance of an antenna? To measure the gain, you must build the antenna, ge; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00339.html (10,722 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: "Dick, W1KSZ" <w1ksz@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 17:33:20 -0400; Another enlightened list member heard from. Too bad his mouth is bigger than his brain. 73, Dick, W1KSZ -- 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ ____________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00348.html (10,727 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: "Cedrick \"Fred\" Johnson - WT2P" <fredwt2p@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 20:02:29 -0400; ..careful of who you call stupid or cheap... What you see.. is not always exactly what you get... wt2p _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00352.html (12,079 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: "Kent Winrich" <kwinrich@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 20:08:02 -0400; WOW has this gotten into a bunch of old men bitching at each other or what? Suggestion.. instead of bashing each other to death, why not find common ground, and create CONSTRUCTIVE criticism??? Calli; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00353.html (13,207 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] Ask the experts (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 20:10:41 EDT; his mouth is bigger than his brain. What a well reasoned, thoughtful post to the almost 2,000 subscribers to TowerTalk! Actually his - and all the others - are pretty thoughtful IMO. Your responses h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00355.html (8,691 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]