Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+B\s+\&\s+W\s+Folded\s+Dipole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+B\s+\&\s+W\s+Folded\s+Dipole\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] B & W Folded Dipole (score: 1): Author: Chuck Smallhouse <w7cs@theriver.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:32:59 -0700; Recently I saw an ad, in maybe QST, by a company selling a dipole that looked like the B & W one. Maybe they bought the rights from B & W ? Does anyone recall the ad and where I saw it ? I've looked; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00272.html (6,956 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] B & W Folded Dipole (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:24:55 +0100; I doubt the B&W design is patented (or that the patent is in force) Anyone can make and sell a terminated folded dipole It's not inherently a bad design, although not popular for amateur radio, which; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00274.html (8,871 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] B & W Folded Dipole (score: 1): Author: <w5gn@mxg.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 05:43:25 -0500; I didn't write the QST article, but I did post some years ago, probably on the Contest ListServer, about my NEGATIVE experience when I tested the antenna on 80 meters in an NAQP Contest, and incremen; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00275.html (9,658 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] B & W Folded Dipole (score: 1): Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 03:13:09 -0500; In Sept. 2010, W1ZR wrote not a review, but an unflattering analysis of terminated folded dipoles based on his analyses and those of VE2CV. It's on the QST archives. Basically, the caveat is understa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00278.html (8,381 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]